Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Chromeless vs Playwright: What are the differences?
What is Chromeless? 🖥 Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda. Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda.
What is Playwright? Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft). It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
Chromeless belongs to "Headless Browsers" category of the tech stack, while Playwright can be primarily classified under "Browser Testing".
Chromeless and Playwright are both open source tools. It seems that Chromeless with 13.3K GitHub stars and 603 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Playwright with 10.9K GitHub stars and 282 GitHub forks.
Pros of Chromeless
Pros of Playwright
- Cross browser13
- Open source10
- Test Runner with Playwright/test9
- Promise based7
- Well documented7
- Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures5
- Execute tests in parallel5
- API Testing5
- Python Support4
- Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail4
- Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json3
- Context isolation3
- Fastest1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Chromeless
Cons of Playwright
- Less help12
- Node based3
- Does not execute outside of browser2