Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Chromeless vs PhantomJS: What are the differences?
Chromeless: 🖥 Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda. Chrome automation made simple. Runs locally or headless on AWS Lambda; PhantomJS: Scriptable Headless WebKit. PhantomJS (www.phantomjs.org) is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
Chromeless and PhantomJS can be categorized as "Headless Browsers" tools.
Chromeless and PhantomJS are both open source tools. PhantomJS with 26.9K GitHub stars and 5.7K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Chromeless with 13.2K GitHub stars and 602 GitHub forks.
I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?
You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.
I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.
Pros of Chromeless
Pros of PhantomJS
- Scriptable web browser13
- Depends on QT3
- No ECMAScript 62