Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NATS

368
483
+ 1
60
Supabase

326
332
+ 1
24
Add tool

NATS vs Supabase: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: NATS is designed for high-performance, real-time messaging, making it ideal for handling high volumes of messages and scaling easily as demand increases. On the other hand, Supabase is a backend as a service platform that focuses on database functionality and real-time subscriptions, providing scalability for data storage and processing.

  2. Functionality: NATS primarily offers messaging capabilities, allowing for secure and efficient communication between distributed systems. In contrast, Supabase provides a range of backend services such as authentication, database hosting, and APIs in addition to real-time capabilities, offering a more comprehensive solution for application development.

  3. Community Support: NATS has a well-established and active open-source community that contributes to the development and improvement of the platform. Meanwhile, Supabase is a newer platform that is rapidly growing its community and receiving support from users, with a focus on continuous updates and feature enhancements based on user feedback.

  4. Use Cases: NATS is commonly used for building microservices architectures, IoT applications, and other distributed systems that require low-latency, high-throughput messaging. In comparison, Supabase is well-suited for applications that need real-time collaboration features, online/offline data synchronization, and rapid prototyping of database-driven applications.

  5. Pricing Model: NATS follows a model where users can choose from various licensing options based on their needs, including open-source, cloud-hosted, or enterprise solutions. Supabase, on the other hand, is based on a freemium model, offering a free-tier plan with limited features and paid plans for additional functionality and support.

  6. Deployment Options: NATS can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or as a managed service through providers like Google Cloud Platform and AWS. In contrast, Supabase offers a fully managed cloud service, simplifying deployment and maintenance for developers without the need for infrastructure management.

In Summary, NATS and Supabase differ in terms of scalability, functionality, community support, use cases, pricing model, and deployment options.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of NATS
Pros of Supabase
  • 22
    Fastest pub-sub system out there
  • 16
    Rock solid
  • 12
    Easy to grasp
  • 4
    Light-weight
  • 4
    Easy, Fast, Secure
  • 2
    Robust Security Model
  • 6
    Relational Database
  • 5
    Self hosting
  • 3
    Free
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Postgres hosting
  • 2
    Easy deployment
  • 1
    Focus on product, not on deployment
  • 1
    Faster development
  • 1
    Realtime
  • 1
    Huge time-saver

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of NATS
Cons of Supabase
  • 2
    Persistence with Jetstream supported
  • 1
    No Order
  • 1
    No Persistence
  • 0
    No cons

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is NATS?

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

What is Supabase?

Supabase is currently in early-Alpha .It is an open-source Firebase alternative. It adds realtime and RESTful APIs to your PostgreSQL database without a single line of code.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use NATS?
What companies use Supabase?
See which teams inside your own company are using NATS or Supabase.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with NATS?
What tools integrate with Supabase?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to NATS and Supabase?
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
gRPC
gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
MQTT
It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
NSQ
NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
See all alternatives