Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Flowdock vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
Integration Capabilities: Flowdock offers a wide range of integrations with various tools and services, making it easy to connect with other platforms seamlessly. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides deep integration with other Microsoft products such as Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive, allowing for a more cohesive experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Customization Options: Flowdock allows users to customize the interface with different themes, emojis, and notifications preferences to suit their preferences. In contrast, Microsoft Teams offers a higher level of customization with features like creating custom tabs, adding connectors, and integrating third-party apps directly into the platform.
Collaboration Features: Flowdock focuses on streamlining communication through chat, threads, and shared inbox features, offering a more focused approach to collaboration. In contrast, Microsoft Teams provides a broader range of collaboration tools including document sharing, real-time co-authoring, and video conferencing, making it a more comprehensive platform for teamwork.
Security and Compliance: Flowdock ensures data security through encryption and access controls, but it may not provide advanced compliance features required by highly regulated industries. Microsoft Teams, being part of the Microsoft 365 suite, offers advanced security measures, compliance features, and data loss prevention capabilities to meet the stringent requirements of corporate environments.
File Storage and Management: Flowdock does not offer built-in file storage capabilities and relies on integrations with services like Google Drive or Dropbox for file management. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides native file storage and sharing options within the platform, making it more convenient for users to store, access, and collaborate on files.
Scalability and Enterprise Readiness: Flowdock is well-suited for small to medium-sized teams looking for a simple and intuitive communication platform. In contrast, Microsoft Teams is designed for scalability and enterprise use, offering features like multi-factor authentication, advanced analytics, and enterprise-grade security to support large organizations with complex communication needs.
In Summary, Flowdock and Microsoft Teams differ in integration capabilities, customization options, collaboration features, security measures, file storage capabilities, and scalability, catering to different user needs and organizational requirements.
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of Flowdock
- Threaded chat34
- Simpler integrations than others, team inbox = awesome30
- Great interface18
- Extremely easy to manage multiple conversations17
- Powerful Search and Tagging Architecture15
- Team Inbox15
- Email and RSS integration for apps w no API12
- See what the team is actually working on9
- Comment on anything you see or do5
- Spark conversations around activity3
- Threads and tags make it great2
- Threaded Inbox for Integrations2
- Threaded chat and separate inbox for integrations2
- Free1
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow28
- Mobile friendly23
- Free19
- Great integrations12
- Well-thought Design11
- Channels10
- Easy setup8
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Multi domain switching support4
- Easy to integrate with4
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Web interface3
- Great voice quality2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Flowdock
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Flowdock?
What is Microsoft Teams?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Microsoft Teams?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Microsoft Teams?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+26