StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. MemSQL vs Redis

MemSQL vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MemSQL
MemSQL
Stacks86
Followers184
Votes44
Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6

MemSQL vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

MemSQL and Redis are both popular in-memory databases used for different purposes. While MemSQL is a distributed database system designed for data warehousing and real-time analytics, Redis is an open-source cache and message broker often used for caching and session management. Here are the key differences between MemSQL and Redis:

  1. Data Model: MemSQL is a SQL database, meaning it uses structured query language to organize and retrieve data. It supports traditional tables, rows, and columns, along with SQL transactions and joins. On the other hand, Redis is a key-value store, where data is stored and retrieved based on unique keys. It doesn't support complex data structures or querying capabilities like MemSQL does.

  2. Performance and Scalability: MemSQL is known for its high performance and scalability. It can handle massive amounts of data and process queries in real-time, making it suitable for handling large datasets and complex analytics. Redis, on the other hand, is optimized for low-latency operations and can efficiently handle high read/write loads. It excels in scenarios where quick data retrieval and caching are required.

  3. Persistence: MemSQL offers both in-memory and disk-based storage options. It can persist data to disk for durability and recovery in case of failures. Redis, on the other hand, primarily stores data in memory and provides optional persistence to disk. It is not meant to be a primary data store with strong durability guarantees.

  4. Data Structures and Features: MemSQL provides a wide array of SQL features, including support for multiple data types, indexing, and complex queries. It also offers built-in functionality for transaction processing and distributed joins. Redis, on the other hand, provides a limited set of data structures like strings, hashes, sets, and lists. It also includes additional features such as pub/sub messaging, geo-spatial indexing, and Lua scripting.

  5. Replication and Clustering: MemSQL supports automatic data replication and offers various clustering options to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. It can distribute data across multiple nodes and provide seamless failover. Redis, on the other hand, offers replication as well but requires additional mechanisms like Redis Sentinel or Redis Cluster for clustering and high availability.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: MemSQL is a commercial database product with a smaller user and developer community compared to open-source Redis. Redis has a large and vibrant community, providing extensive documentation, libraries, and third-party integrations. It benefits from widespread adoption and continuous development by contributors worldwide.

In summary, MemSQL and Redis differ in terms of their data models, performance characteristics, persistence mechanisms, available features, replication and clustering options, and community support. These differences make each database more suitable for specific use cases and scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MemSQL
MemSQL
Redis
Redis

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

ANSI SQL Support;Fully-distributed Joins;Compiled Queries; ACID Compliance;In-Memory Tables;On-Disk Tables; Massively Parallel Execution;Lock Free Data Structures;JSON Support; High Availability; Online Backup and Restore;Online Replication
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6
Stacks
86
Stacks
61.9K
Followers
184
Followers
46.5K
Votes
44
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Distributed
  • 5
    Realtime
  • 4
    JSON
  • 4
    Concurrent
  • 4
    Columnstore
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Integrations
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
MySQL
MySQL
QlikView
QlikView
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to MemSQL, Redis?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase