Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Headless UI

42
44
+ 1
0
Material-UI

2.6K
3.6K
+ 1
441
Add tool

Headless UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Headless UI and Material-UI are two popular UI libraries used for building user interfaces in web applications. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that make them distinct from each other.

  1. Component Styles: One key difference between Headless UI and Material-UI is how they handle component styles. Headless UI provides a set of minimalistic and unstyled components that developers can customize according to their own design needs. On the other hand, Material-UI comes with its own pre-designed and styled components following the Material Design guidelines. This allows developers to quickly create visually appealing interfaces without much customization effort.

  2. Design Language: Headless UI does not enforce a specific design language or style. It provides a more flexible and customizable approach where developers can define their own design system or integrate with other existing design systems. In contrast, Material-UI strictly adheres to the Material Design language, providing a consistent user experience across different platforms and applications.

  3. Component Ecosystem: Material-UI has a more extensive component ecosystem compared to Headless UI. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use components such as buttons, inputs, and modals, making it easier for developers to build complex UIs quickly. Headless UI, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a foundation of basic building blocks that developers can use to build their own custom components and UI patterns.

  4. Accessibility: Material-UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, ensuring that its components are usable by all users, including those with disabilities. It provides built-in accessibility features and follows best practices to make the UI accessible. While Headless UI also supports accessibility, it does not have the same level of built-in accessibility features as Material-UI.

  5. Developer Experience: Headless UI offers a more developer-centric experience, providing a set of utility functions and hooks that can be used to customize and control the behavior of the components. It empowers developers to have more control over the UI logic and allows for advanced UI customization. Material-UI, on the other hand, focuses more on abstracting away the implementation details and providing a simpler and more intuitive API for developers to work with.

  6. Community and Support: Material-UI has a larger and more active community compared to Headless UI. It has a vast amount of online resources, documentation, and community forums where developers can ask questions, share knowledge, and seek help. Headless UI, while still being widely used, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available in comparison.

In summary, the key differences between Headless UI and Material-UI lie in their approach to component styles, design language, component ecosystem, accessibility, developer experience, and community support.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Headless UI
Pros of Material-UI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 141
      React
    • 82
      Material Design
    • 60
      Ui components
    • 30
      CSS framework
    • 25
      Component
    • 14
      Looks great
    • 12
      Responsive
    • 12
      Good documentation
    • 9
      LESS
    • 8
      Ui component
    • 7
      Open source
    • 6
      Code examples
    • 6
      Flexible
    • 5
      JSS
    • 3
      Angular
    • 3
      Very accessible
    • 3
      Fun
    • 3
      Supports old browsers out of the box
    • 2
      Typescript support
    • 2
      # of components
    • 2
      Interface
    • 2
      Designed for Server Side Rendering
    • 1
      Support for multiple styling systems
    • 1
      Css
    • 1
      Easy to work with
    • 1
      Accessibility

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Headless UI
    Cons of Material-UI
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 34
        Hard to learn. Bad documentation
      • 27
        Hard to customize
      • 20
        Hard to understand Docs
      • 7
        Bad performance
      • 6
        Extra library needed for date/time pickers
      • 6
        For editable table component need to use material-table
      • 1
        Typescript Support
      • 0
        # of components

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Headless UI?

      It is a set of completely unstyled, fully accessible UI components, designed to integrate beautifully with Tailwind CSS.

      What is Material-UI?

      Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Headless UI?
      What companies use Material-UI?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Headless UI or Material-UI.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Headless UI?
      What tools integrate with Material-UI?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Headless UI and Material-UI?
      Ionicons
      Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed.
      Ant Design
      An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
      Chakra UI
      It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.
      DevExtreme
      From Angular and React, to ASP.NET Core or Vue, it includes a comprehensive collection of high-performance and responsive UI widgets for use in traditional web and next-gen mobile applications. The suite ships with a feature-complete data grid, interactive charts widgets, data editors, and much more.
      ElementUI
      It is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews.
      See all alternatives