Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CARTO vs Mapbox: What are the differences?
Key Differences between CARTO and Mapbox
CARTO and Mapbox are both popular web mapping platforms that offer many similar features, such as interactive data visualization, geocoding, and map styling capabilities. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that set them apart.
Pricing Model: CARTO offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of users and data storage, with different plans available for different levels of usage. Mapbox, on the other hand, offers a usage-based pricing model, where users pay based on the number of requests made to the platform.
Customization Options: While both CARTO and Mapbox provide customization options for maps and data visualization, Mapbox offers more flexibility and control over the visual appearance of maps. Mapbox allows users to customize map styles using their own design tools or by using open-source mapping libraries like Mapbox GL JS.
Data Integration: CARTO provides built-in support for common spatial data formats, such as shapefiles and GeoJSON, making it easier for users to directly import and visualize their data. Mapbox, on the other hand, relies on a data source like Mapbox Studio or external APIs to load and display spatial data.
Geocoding Services: Mapbox offers its own geocoding service, which provides accurate and up-to-date address search and reverse geocoding capabilities. CARTO, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in geocoding service and requires users to rely on third-party geocoding providers.
Collaboration and Sharing: CARTO offers collaborative features that allow multiple users to work on a map together, share their work, and provide access controls. Mapbox, on the other hand, focuses more on providing tools for map creation and customization, with limited collaboration features available.
Developer-Focused Features: Mapbox provides a robust set of APIs and SDKs that allow developers to integrate maps and location-based services into their own applications. Mapbox also offers extensive documentation and developer resources, making it a preferred choice for developers who require more advanced functionality.
In summary, CARTO and Mapbox are both powerful web mapping platforms, but they differ in pricing models, customization options, data integration, geocoding services, collaboration features, and developer-focused capabilities.
From a StackShare Community member: "We're a team of two starting to write a mobile app. The app will heavily rely on maps and this is where my partner and I are not seeing eye-to-eye. I would like to go with an open source solution like OpenStreetMap that is used by Apple & Foursquare. He would like to go with Google Maps since more apps use it and has better support (according to him). Mapbox is also an option but I don’t know much about it."
I use Mapbox because We need 3D maps and navigation, it has a great plugin for React and React Native which we use. Also the Mapbox Geocoder is great.
Google Maps is best because it is practically free (they give you $300 in free credits per month and it's really hard to go over the free tier unless you really mean business) and it's the best!
I use OpenStreetMap because that has a strong community. It takes some time to catch up with Google Maps, but OpenStreetMap will become great solution.
I use Google Maps because it has a lot of great features such as Google's rich APIs, geolocation functions, navigation search feature, street map view, auto-generated 3D city map.
I use OpenStreetMap because i have the control of the environment, using Docker containers or bare-metal servers.
Pros of CARTO
- Crisp UI1
- Great customer service1
- Comprehensive platform1
Pros of Mapbox
- Best mapping service outside of Google Maps28
- OpenStreetMap22
- Beautifully vectorable15
- Fluid user experience11
- Extensible8
- React/ RNative integration7
- 3D Layers5
- Low Level API4
- Affordable4
- Great customer support3
- Custom themes3
- High data volume rendering2