Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

BlazeMeter

67
154
+ 1
13
Locust

171
314
+ 1
51
Add tool

BlazeMeter vs Locust: What are the differences?

Introduction:

BlazeMeter and Locust are two popular tools used for load testing and performance testing of web applications. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Programming Language: One of the key differences between BlazeMeter and Locust is the programming language used for scripting tests. BlazeMeter primarily uses YAML, whereas Locust is based on Python. This difference can impact the ease of writing and maintaining test scripts, depending on the user's familiarity with the languages.

  2. User Interface: Another significant difference lies in the user interface of BlazeMeter and Locust. BlazeMeter offers a user-friendly, web-based interface that simplifies test configuration and monitoring, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In contrast, Locust provides a more minimalistic, command-line interface that may require more technical knowledge to operate efficiently.

  3. Distributed Testing: BlazeMeter is designed for scalable, cloud-based load testing, allowing users to easily distribute tests across multiple servers or locations for comprehensive performance analysis. Locust, on the other hand, relies on the user's infrastructure for distributed testing, which may require additional configuration and setup for achieving similar scalability.

  4. Community Support: When it comes to community support and resources, Locust has a strong open-source community that actively contributes to its development and provides extensive documentation and plugins. BlazeMeter, being a commercial tool, offers dedicated support and resources but may lack the same level of community-driven content and collaboration.

  5. Cost Structure: The cost structure of BlazeMeter and Locust also differs significantly. BlazeMeter is a paid tool that offers various pricing plans based on the number of virtual users and test duration. In contrast, Locust is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective option for users with budget constraints or those seeking flexibility in test customization and deployment.

In Summary, BlazeMeter and Locust differ in terms of programming language, user interface, distributed testing capabilities, community support, and cost structure, catering to a diverse range of load testing requirements and preferences.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of BlazeMeter
Pros of Locust
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
  • 15
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Fast
  • 2
    Test Anything

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of BlazeMeter
Cons of Locust
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric
  • 1
    Bad design

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is BlazeMeter?

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

What is Locust?

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use BlazeMeter?
What companies use Locust?
See which teams inside your own company are using BlazeMeter or Locust.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with BlazeMeter?
What tools integrate with Locust?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to BlazeMeter and Locust?
Flood IO
Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.
Gatling
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.
Load Impact
It is performance testing platform brings performance testing to the developer’s turf. Developers of all skill levels are able to easily pick up manual testing with it and simply transition to the more modern principles of DevOps and performance testing automation.
Runscope
Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.
RedLine13
It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.
See all alternatives