Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Liquid vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Liquid and Nunjucks templating languages, highlighting the specific distinctions between the two.
1. Syntax:
Liquid uses a simple and intuitive syntax that is easy to read and write, with tags and filters enclosed in double curly braces. On the other hand, Nunjucks employs a more complex syntax, providing flexibility by allowing using delimiters and tags enclosed within its own syntax.
2. Template Inheritance:
Liquid lacks native support for template inheritance, making it less suitable for complex layouts with multiple levels of inheritance. In contrast, Nunjucks provides native and robust support for template inheritance, allowing for a more modular and organized approach to building layouts.
3. Custom Filters:
While both Liquid and Nunjucks allow the use of filters to modify and format data, Nunjucks provides more extensive and flexible support for creating custom filters. With Nunjucks, developers can easily define and use custom filters to manipulate data according to their specific requirements.
4. JavaScript-based:
Nunjucks, being inspired by Jinja2, is primarily JavaScript-based and is often used in JavaScript environments like Node.js. Whereas Liquid is primarily used in Ruby environments like Jekyll, making it more suited for Ruby developers.
5. Performance and Caching:
Due to its simpler syntax and design, Liquid generally performs better and is easier to cache compared to Nunjucks. Nunjucks, being more feature-rich and extensible, may require additional resources and overhead for rendering, impacting performance in larger-scale applications.
6. Compatibility:
Liquid is widely supported across various platforms and frameworks, including Jekyll, Shopify, and GitHub Pages. In contrast, while Nunjucks is gaining popularity, it may require additional configuration and integration in some platforms, limiting its compatibility to certain frameworks and environments.
In Summary, Liquid and Nunjucks differ in syntax simplicity, template inheritance support, custom filter flexibility, language association, performance and caching characteristics, as well as platform compatibility.
@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.
Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?
Thanks In Advance
I like Handlebars, it's very mature... some would say-- outdated.
Handlebars loops are done via {{#each myList}}. Read the docs! https://handlebarsjs.com/guide
Remember, don't put logic in your templates! Keep this layer simple. Sorry to hear you have to use dotNet.
Pros of Liquid
Pros of Nunjucks
- Supported by Mozilla3
- Easy sintaxis like JS2