Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Liquid

197
120
+ 1
0
Nunjucks

73
87
+ 1
5
Add tool

Liquid vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Liquid and Nunjucks templating languages, highlighting the specific distinctions between the two.

1. Syntax:

Liquid uses a simple and intuitive syntax that is easy to read and write, with tags and filters enclosed in double curly braces. On the other hand, Nunjucks employs a more complex syntax, providing flexibility by allowing using delimiters and tags enclosed within its own syntax.

2. Template Inheritance:

Liquid lacks native support for template inheritance, making it less suitable for complex layouts with multiple levels of inheritance. In contrast, Nunjucks provides native and robust support for template inheritance, allowing for a more modular and organized approach to building layouts.

3. Custom Filters:

While both Liquid and Nunjucks allow the use of filters to modify and format data, Nunjucks provides more extensive and flexible support for creating custom filters. With Nunjucks, developers can easily define and use custom filters to manipulate data according to their specific requirements.

4. JavaScript-based:

Nunjucks, being inspired by Jinja2, is primarily JavaScript-based and is often used in JavaScript environments like Node.js. Whereas Liquid is primarily used in Ruby environments like Jekyll, making it more suited for Ruby developers.

5. Performance and Caching:

Due to its simpler syntax and design, Liquid generally performs better and is easier to cache compared to Nunjucks. Nunjucks, being more feature-rich and extensible, may require additional resources and overhead for rendering, impacting performance in larger-scale applications.

6. Compatibility:

Liquid is widely supported across various platforms and frameworks, including Jekyll, Shopify, and GitHub Pages. In contrast, while Nunjucks is gaining popularity, it may require additional configuration and integration in some platforms, limiting its compatibility to certain frameworks and environments.

In Summary, Liquid and Nunjucks differ in syntax simplicity, template inheritance support, custom filter flexibility, language association, performance and caching characteristics, as well as platform compatibility.

Advice on Liquid and Nunjucks
Asad Gilani
Software Engineer at Lisec Automation · | 5 upvotes · 203K views
Needs advice
on
Handlebars.jsHandlebars.js
and
LiquidLiquid

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

See more
Replies (1)
Josh Lind
Recommends
on
Handlebars.jsHandlebars.js

I like Handlebars, it's very mature... some would say-- outdated.

Handlebars loops are done via {{#each myList}}. Read the docs! https://handlebarsjs.com/guide

Remember, don't put logic in your templates! Keep this layer simple. Sorry to hear you have to use dotNet.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Liquid
Pros of Nunjucks
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Supported by Mozilla
    • 2
      Easy sintaxis like JS

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Liquid?

    It is an open-source template language written in Ruby. It is the backbone of Shopify themes and is used to load dynamic content on storefronts. It is safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.

    What is Nunjucks?

    Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Liquid?
    What companies use Nunjucks?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Liquid or Nunjucks.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Liquid?
    What tools integrate with Nunjucks?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Liquid and Nunjucks?
    TypeScript
    TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
    Handlebars.js
    Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.
    Smarty
    Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation
    Mustache
    Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.
    Jinja
    It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.
    See all alternatives