Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

KVM

182
231
+ 1
8
XenServer

53
57
+ 1
0
Add tool

KVM vs XenServer: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will explore the key differences between KVM and XenServer, two popular virtualization technologies.

  1. Hypervisor Type: KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution, whereas XenServer is a hybrid hypervisor that supports both paravirtualization and full virtualization. KVM virtualizes the hardware resources directly using the host's kernel, while XenServer uses a hypervisor layer between the host operating system and the virtual machines.

  2. Platform Support: KVM is primarily a Linux-based virtualization solution and works best on Linux platforms. On the other hand, XenServer is a hypervisor that can run on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and FreeBSD. It provides broader platform support compared to KVM.

  3. Management Tools: KVM relies on open-source management tools like libvirt and virt-manager for managing virtual machines. XenServer, on the other hand, offers a proprietary management tool called XenCenter. XenCenter provides a user-friendly GUI and advanced management features like live migration and high availability, making it more suitable for enterprise environments.

  4. Performance: KVM leverages hardware virtualization extensions (Intel VT and AMD-V) to provide near-native performance. This allows KVM to achieve better performance compared to XenServer, especially for workloads that require high CPU utilization. However, XenServer's paravirtualization approach can offer better overall performance in certain scenarios, especially when running multiple virtual machines on a single host.

  5. Virtualization Overhead: KVM has a relatively low virtualization overhead since it runs virtual machines directly on the host operating system. On the other hand, XenServer introduces an additional layer (the hypervisor) between the host and the virtual machines, which can potentially impact performance to some extent. However, the actual overhead may vary depending on factors like workload type and system configuration.

  6. Licensing: KVM is an open-source virtualization solution and is included in the Linux kernel. It is available for free and has no licensing costs. XenServer, on the other hand, has a commercial license model. While it offers a free version called XenServer Free, certain advanced features and support require a paid license.

In summary, KVM is a full virtualization solution primarily focused on Linux platforms, while XenServer is a hybrid hypervisor with broader platform support. KVM provides better performance and has lower virtualization overhead, while XenServer offers advanced management tools, paravirtualization capability, and a commercial licensing model.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of KVM
Pros of XenServer
  • 4
    No license issues
  • 2
    Very fast
  • 2
    Flexible network options
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is KVM?

    KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

    What is XenServer?

    It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use KVM?
    What companies use XenServer?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with KVM?
    What tools integrate with XenServer?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to KVM and XenServer?
      VirtualBox
      VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.
      Qemu
      When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.
      OpenVZ
      Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.
      Xen
      It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.
      Docker
      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
      See all alternatives