Google App Engine vs Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google App Engine

10K
7.8K
+ 1
610
Kubernetes

58.5K
50.6K
+ 1
677
Add tool

Google App Engine vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Google App Engine (GAE) and Kubernetes, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Deployment and Scaling: In Google App Engine (GAE), the deployment and scaling of applications are handled automatically by Google, with the platform managing the underlying infrastructure and resources. On the other hand, Kubernetes allows more granular control over deployment and scaling, giving users the flexibility to define and manage these aspects themselves.

  2. Container Orchestration: While both GAE and Kubernetes support running applications in containers, their approaches to container orchestration differ. GAE provides a fully managed environment where developers only need to focus on their application code, while Kubernetes offers a container orchestration platform that allows for more advanced operations and control, such as automatic scaling and managing container lifecycle.

  3. Flexibility and Customization: Google App Engine abstracts away much of the infrastructure and configuration details, offering a more opinionated and simplified experience. Kubernetes, on the other hand, gives users full control and flexibility over their infrastructure and application stack, enabling customization and the use of various tools and technologies.

  4. Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Deployments: Kubernetes is designed to work across multiple cloud providers and even on-premises environments, allowing for hybrid and multi-cloud deployments. Google App Engine, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform and is optimized for running applications specifically on Google's infrastructure.

  5. Resource Utilization and Efficiency: Kubernetes provides extensive features to optimize resource utilization, including resource allocation, scheduling, and auto-scaling based on metrics like CPU and memory usage. While Google App Engine also handles scaling automatically, Kubernetes offers more advanced resource management capabilities, enabling fine-tuning and optimization for specific application requirements.

  6. Monitoring and Debugging: Kubernetes offers a range of built-in monitoring and debugging features, including logging, health checks, and metric collection. Google App Engine also provides monitoring capabilities, but Kubernetes exposes more advanced functionalities and integrations with various monitoring tools and frameworks.

In summary, Google App Engine is a fully managed platform that simplifies deployment and scalability, granting less control but ease of use, while Kubernetes offers more flexibility and control over deployment, scaling, and infrastructure, enabling sophisticated container orchestration and multi-cloud support.

Decisions about Google App Engine and Kubernetes
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Google App Engine
Pros of Kubernetes
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
  • 35
    Low cost
  • 32
    Comprehensive set of features
  • 28
    All services in one place
  • 22
    Simple scaling
  • 19
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 6
    Granular Billing
  • 5
    Easy to develop and unit test
  • 4
    Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators
  • 3
    Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack
  • 3
    Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints
  • 2
    Mostly up
  • 2
    No Ops
  • 164
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 128
    Simple and powerful
  • 106
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google App Engine
Cons of Kubernetes
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 16
      Steep learning curve
    • 15
      Poor workflow for development
    • 8
      Orchestrates only infrastructure
    • 4
      High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
    • 2
      Too heavy for simple systems
    • 1
      Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
    • 1
      More moving parts to secure
    • 1
      Additional Technology Overhead

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Google App Engine?

    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

    What is Kubernetes?

    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Google App Engine?
    What companies use Kubernetes?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Google App Engine or Kubernetes.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Google App Engine?
    What tools integrate with Kubernetes?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Kubernetesetcd+2
    2
    1159
    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2355
    PythonDockerKubernetes+7
    3
    1101
    May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
    5
    1495
    Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

    Rancher Labs

    KubernetesRancher+2
    2
    934
    What are some alternatives to Google App Engine and Kubernetes?
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    DigitalOcean
    We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.
    AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    See all alternatives