Kendo UI vs PrimeNg

Overview

Kendo UI

Stacks297

Followers359

Votes33

GitHub Stars2.6K

Forks1.9K

PrimeNg

Stacks229

Followers286

Votes15

GitHub Stars12.1K

Forks5.0K

Kendo UI vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Kendo UI and PrimeNg are two popular UI component libraries that developers can use to enhance the user interface of their web applications. While both libraries offer a wide range of components and features, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

Language Compatibility: One of the key differences between Kendo UI and PrimeNg is their language compatibility. Kendo UI primarily targets JavaScript and supports integration with frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue.js. On the other hand, PrimeNg is built specifically for Angular applications and provides extensive support for Angular components and features.
Component Availability: Another important difference is the availability of components. Kendo UI offers a comprehensive set of components, including charts, grids, calendars, and more. It also provides a rich set of themes and customization options. PrimeNg, on the other hand, provides a smaller set of components compared to Kendo UI but focuses on providing high-quality and well-documented Angular components.
Community and Support: The community and support for a UI library can greatly impact its adoption and usage. Kendo UI has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums. It also provides commercial support through its vendor, Telerik. PrimeNg also has a growing community and offers documentation, examples, and a forum for developers to seek help. However, the level of commercial support may be different compared to Kendo UI.
Performance and Optimization: Performance is a crucial aspect when choosing a UI library. Kendo UI is known for its performance optimizations, including lazy loading, virtualization, and asynchronous loading of components. It also provides a built-in caching mechanism for better performance. PrimeNg also focuses on performance and provides optimizations for Angular applications, such as change detection strategies, reactive forms, and server-side rendering.
Theming and Customization: The ability to customize the appearance and style of UI components can greatly impact the overall look and feel of an application. Kendo UI offers a wide range of themes and styling options, allowing developers to easily customize the components to match their application's design. PrimeNg also provides theming options, but the customization capabilities may be more limited compared to Kendo UI.
Pricing and Licensing: Pricing and licensing models can also be a differentiating factor for developers. Kendo UI offers a commercial license with different pricing options based on the requirements of the project. It also provides a free trial and an open-source version called Kendo UI Core. PrimeNg, on the other hand, is an open-source library released under the MIT license, making it free for commercial use.

In Summary, Kendo UI and PrimeNg differ in language compatibility, component availability, community and support, performance and optimization, theming and customization, as well as pricing and licensing. Developers should consider these differences when choosing the right UI library for their web application needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI	PrimeNg
Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.	It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.
Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core	Single library for all components; supports templating; Active development; offers a list of themes for UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.6K	GitHub Stars 12.1K
GitHub Forks 1.9K	GitHub Forks 5.0K
Stacks 297	Stacks 229
Followers 359	Followers 286
Votes 33	Votes 15
Pros & Cons
Pros 15 Collection of controls 5 Speed 4 Mobile 4 Multi-framework support 2 Built-in router Cons 4 Massive footprint 3 Slow 1 Poor customizability 1 Spotty Documentation 1 Awdawd	Pros 6 Complete 4 Wide range of components 3 Easy to use 1 Modern UI components that work across the web 1 Already 17+ version up Cons 4 Components are hard to customize 3 Need to buy themes 3 Easy to use 2 Hard to understand 2 Functionality differs for all components
Integrations
Bootstrap AngularJS	Angular Angular CLI

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, PrimeNg?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Kendo UI vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Language Compatibility: One of the key differences between Kendo UI and PrimeNg is their language compatibility. Kendo UI primarily targets JavaScript and supports integration with frameworks like Angular, React, and Vue.js. On the other hand, PrimeNg is built specifically for Angular applications and provides extensive support for Angular components and features.
Component Availability: Another important difference is the availability of components. Kendo UI offers a comprehensive set of components, including charts, grids, calendars, and more. It also provides a rich set of themes and customization options. PrimeNg, on the other hand, provides a smaller set of components compared to Kendo UI but focuses on providing high-quality and well-documented Angular components.
Community and Support: The community and support for a UI library can greatly impact its adoption and usage. Kendo UI has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums. It also provides commercial support through its vendor, Telerik. PrimeNg also has a growing community and offers documentation, examples, and a forum for developers to seek help. However, the level of commercial support may be different compared to Kendo UI.
Performance and Optimization: Performance is a crucial aspect when choosing a UI library. Kendo UI is known for its performance optimizations, including lazy loading, virtualization, and asynchronous loading of components. It also provides a built-in caching mechanism for better performance. PrimeNg also focuses on performance and provides optimizations for Angular applications, such as change detection strategies, reactive forms, and server-side rendering.
Theming and Customization: The ability to customize the appearance and style of UI components can greatly impact the overall look and feel of an application. Kendo UI offers a wide range of themes and styling options, allowing developers to easily customize the components to match their application's design. PrimeNg also provides theming options, but the customization capabilities may be more limited compared to Kendo UI.
Pricing and Licensing: Pricing and licensing models can also be a differentiating factor for developers. Kendo UI offers a commercial license with different pricing options based on the requirements of the project. It also provides a free trial and an open-source version called Kendo UI Core. PrimeNg, on the other hand, is an open-source library released under the MIT license, making it free for commercial use.

Kendo UI vs PrimeNg

Overview