Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

EJS

347
352
+ 1
18
JSX

108
103
+ 1
2
Add tool

EJS vs JSX: What are the differences?

EJS vs JSX: Key Differences

EJS (Embedded JavaScript) and JSX (JavaScript XML) are two popular templating languages used in web development. Although both are used to dynamically generate HTML content, there are key differences between the two. Here are six main differences between EJS and JSX:

1. Syntax: EJS uses a syntax similar to regular HTML, where embedded JavaScript code is enclosed within <% %> tags. On the other hand, JSX combines HTML and JavaScript syntax directly, allowing developers to write JavaScript code within curly braces {}.

2. Execution: EJS is executed on the server-side, meaning that the HTML is generated on the server and sent to the client. JSX, on the other hand, is executed on the client-side using a tool called Babel, which compiles JSX into JavaScript that can be run by the browser.

3. Tool Dependencies: EJS requires server-side support and needs to be installed as a dependency in the backend framework or server. JSX, on the other hand, requires a build step using tools like Babel or webpack to transform JSX code into regular JavaScript.

4. Conditional Rendering: In EJS, conditional rendering is achieved using embedded JavaScript code and traditional control structures like if-else statements. JSX, on the other hand, allows developers to use JavaScript expressions and conditional rendering directly within the HTML-like syntax.

5. Component Reusability: EJS supports component reusability to an extent, but it requires manual separation and inclusion of partial templates. JSX, on the other hand, embraces the component-based approach of React, allowing for easy and reusable component creation with props and state.

6. Development Ecosystem: EJS has been around for a while and has a mature ecosystem, with support for various backend frameworks and libraries. JSX, on the other hand, is primarily associated with the React library, which has a huge and active development ecosystem with a rich set of tools and libraries.

In summary, EJS and JSX differ in syntax, execution, tool dependencies, conditional rendering, component reusability, and development ecosystem.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of EJS
Pros of JSX
  • 6
    For a beginner it's just plain javascript code
  • 6
    It'a easy to understand the concept behind it
  • 3
    You almost know how to use it from start
  • 3
    Quick for templating UI project
  • 1
    Can be used with React
  • 1
    Supports React

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of EJS
Cons of JSX
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      JSX is a con of React

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is EJS?

    It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

    What is JSX?

    It is designed to run on modern web browsers. It performs optimization while compiling the source code to JavaScript. The generated code runs faster than an equivalent code written directly in JavaScript.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use EJS?
    What companies use JSX?
    See which teams inside your own company are using EJS or JSX.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with EJS?
    What tools integrate with JSX?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to EJS and JSX?
    Handlebars.js
    Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Pug
    This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.
    Mustache
    Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.
    TypeScript
    TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
    See all alternatives