Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Svelte vs jQuery: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Svelte and jQuery.
Performance: One of the major differences between Svelte and jQuery is their approach to performance. Svelte is a compile-time framework, which means that it converts the code into highly efficient JavaScript during the build process. This helps in reducing the size of the final JavaScript bundle and improving the overall performance of the application. On the other hand, jQuery operates at runtime and relies on traversing the DOM to manipulate elements, which can have a performance impact, especially in large applications.
Size: Another important difference is the size of the libraries. Svelte is a lightweight framework, with its core library being only a few kilobytes in size. This makes it ideal for building small, fast applications. On the other hand, jQuery is a larger library, with its minified version being around 84 kilobytes. This can have an impact on the loading time of the website, especially on slower network connections.
Reactivity: Svelte has built-in reactivity, which means that any changes made to the data are automatically reflected in the DOM. This allows developers to write code that is more declarative and easier to reason about. In contrast, jQuery does not have built-in reactivity and developers need to manually update the DOM when the data changes. This can lead to more verbose and error-prone code.
Component-based architecture: Svelte promotes a component-based architecture, where UI elements are encapsulated within reusable components. This encourages modular code and makes it easier to manage and maintain complex applications. On the other hand, jQuery does not have a built-in component system and developers need to manually manage the state and behavior of UI elements.
Browser support: Svelte supports modern browsers and does not require any additional polyfills or libraries. It takes advantage of new JavaScript features, such as reactive programming and template literals. On the other hand, jQuery has good backward compatibility and supports older browsers, making it a suitable choice for projects that need to target a wide range of browsers.
Learning curve: Svelte has a steeper learning curve compared to jQuery. Svelte introduces new concepts and syntax, such as reactive statements and stores, which may require some time for developers to become familiar with. On the other hand, jQuery has a simpler syntax and a large community that provides extensive documentation and resources, making it easier for beginners to get started.
In summary, Svelte and jQuery differ in terms of performance, size, reactivity, component-based architecture, browser support, and learning curve. Svelte focuses on high performance and efficient code generation, while jQuery offers backward compatibility and a simpler syntax.
I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.
I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.
Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.
Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.
It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.
This is going to be used with the application.
for old/ lite devices . ie. * android tv, * micro linux, * possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer * android go devices * android One devices
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of Svelte
- Performance57
- Reactivity40
- Components35
- Simplicity35
- Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)34
- Lightweight30
- Near to no learning curve28
- Fast as vanilajs26
- Real Reactivity26
- All in one22
- Compiler based18
- Use existing js libraries18
- SSR17
- Scalable16
- Very easy for beginners16
- Composable13
- No runtime overhead12
- Ease of use12
- Built in store10
- Typescript9
- Start with pure html + css7
- Best Developer Experience7
- Templates6
- Speed4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2
Cons of Svelte
- Event Listener Overload3
- Little to no libraries2
- Complex2
- Learning Curve2
- Hard to learn2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is jQuery?
What is Svelte?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with jQuery?
What tools integrate with Svelte?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+43
+26+29