StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Hyper Terminal vs SecureCRT

Hyper Terminal vs SecureCRT

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal
Stacks105
Followers165
Votes0

Hyper Terminal vs SecureCRT: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown highlights the key differences between Hyper Terminal and SecureCRT for users to make an informed decision based on their specific needs.

1. **Cross-platform Compatibility**: Hyper Terminal is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a versatile option for users operating on different systems. On the other hand, SecureCRT is limited to Windows and macOS, which may restrict users who rely on Linux for their daily tasks.
2. **Customization Options**: Hyper Terminal offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal experience with themes, plugins, and extensions. In contrast, SecureCRT provides a more traditional interface with limited customization capabilities, catering to users who prefer simplicity over extensive customization.
3. **Price**: Hyper Terminal is an open-source project and is available for free, making it an attractive option for users on a budget or those who prefer open-source software. SecureCRT, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a paid license for full access to all features, which may be a consideration for users looking for a feature-rich terminal emulator.
4. **Security Features**: SecureCRT is known for its robust security features, offering encryption protocols like SSH, Telnet, and others, ensuring a secure connection for sensitive data transmission. While Hyper Terminal also provides basic security protocols, it may not match the advanced security features of SecureCRT, making it a better choice for users prioritizing security.
5. **User Interface**: Hyper Terminal features a modern and visually appealing user interface, designed to enhance the user experience and improve productivity through intuitive design elements. SecureCRT, on the other hand, maintains a more traditional user interface, which may appeal to users who prefer a classic terminal emulator layout without any unnecessary frills.
6. **Community Support**: Hyper Terminal benefits from a large and active community of developers and users who continuously contribute to its development, provide support, and create additional plugins and themes. SecureCRT, although well-established, may lack the same level of community support and resources, which could impact users seeking extensive online assistance and resources.

In Summary, the key differences between Hyper Terminal and SecureCRT lie in cross-platform compatibility, customization options, pricing, security features, user interface design, and community support, allowing users to choose the terminal emulator that best aligns with their specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Keyword highlighting enhancement; Command Manager (Windows only); Local shell session (Windows); True Color support; Dark Mode support
Extensions; Keymaps; Configuration; Cross Platform; Open source; Themes
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
105
Followers
5
Followers
165
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to SecureCRT, Hyper Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope