StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Hyper Terminal vs Putty

Hyper Terminal vs Putty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal
Stacks105
Followers165
Votes0

Hyper Terminal vs Putty: What are the differences?

Both Hyper Terminal and Putty are popular terminal emulators used to connect to remote servers or devices. Let's discuss the key differences between Hyper Terminal and Putty.

  1. User Interface: Hyper Terminal has a more modern and visually appealing user interface compared to Putty. It offers various customization options, themes, and a robust set of features to enhance the overall user experience. Putty, on the other hand, has a simpler and more straightforward user interface without many customization options or graphical enhancements.

  2. Cross-Platform Support: Hyper Terminal is designed specifically for macOS and Windows operating systems, providing seamless compatibility across these platforms. Putty, on the contrary, is a truly cross-platform tool, available not only for Windows but also for Unix-like operating systems including Linux and macOS.

  3. Configuration Options: Hyper Terminal offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to customize various aspects including fonts, text colors, cursor styles, and more. It also supports keyboard shortcuts and allows users to create custom key bindings. Putty, although not as feature-rich in terms of configuration options as Hyper Terminal, provides enough flexibility to adjust settings such as terminal appearance, window behavior, and connection parameters.

  4. File Transfer Protocols: Putty has an advantage over Hyper Terminal when it comes to file transfer protocols. Putty includes a built-in SCP (Secure Copy Protocol) client, allowing users to securely transfer files between local and remote systems. Hyper Terminal, on the other hand, does not have native support for file transfer protocols, although it can be supplemented with third-party tools for this functionality.

  5. Session Management: Hyper Terminal offers more advanced session management capabilities compared to Putty. It allows users to save and organize multiple sessions, making it easier to connect to frequently accessed servers or devices. Putty, while it supports session saving, lacks some of the more advanced organization features provided by Hyper Terminal.

  6. Integration and Extensions: In terms of integration with other tools and extensions, Hyper Terminal has a slight edge over Putty. It provides integration with popular tools like Git and HyperJS, allowing users to easily perform version control operations and extend the functionality of their terminal emulator. Putty, while it can be extended with additional tools, does not offer the same level of integration as Hyper Terminal.

In summary, Hyper Terminal provides a more visually appealing and feature-rich experience. Putty offers cross-platform support and built-in file transfer functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Putty
Putty
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

SSH client
Extensions; Keymaps; Configuration; Cross Platform; Open source; Themes
Statistics
Stacks
182
Stacks
105
Followers
117
Followers
165
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to Putty, Hyper Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

SecureCRT

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope