Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gatsby

3.3K
2.4K
+ 1
121
Hugo

1.3K
1.2K
+ 1
206
Add tool

Gatsby vs Hugo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gatsby and Hugo are both static site generators that allow developers to create fast, efficient, and highly customizable websites. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. This markdown code will highlight the main differences between Gatsby and Hugo.

  1. Development Language: Gatsby is primarily built using JavaScript and utilizes React as its front-end framework. This makes it a great choice for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript and want to leverage the power of React. On the other hand, Hugo is built using the Go programming language, which provides advantages such as better performance and concurrency. Developers comfortable with Go will find Hugo an appealing choice.

  2. Plugin Ecosystem: Gatsby boasts a rich and extensive plugin ecosystem which allows developers to easily add functionality and features to their websites. These plugins can be used to optimize images, fetch data from various CMS platforms, add analytics, and much more. Hugo, on the other hand, has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to Gatsby. While it still offers useful plugins, the range and diversity are not as extensive as Gatsby.

  3. Performance and Building: Gatsby's build process includes a pre-rendering step, where the entire website is generated as static HTML and assets. This results in blazing fast performance as the website is served directly from a CDN, ensuring quick load times. Additionally, Gatsby utilizes GraphQL to fetch data, enabling developers to have fine-grained control over their data sources. Hugo, on the other hand, is known for its exceptional speed due to its single-binary architecture. It builds static websites incredibly quickly, making it an ideal choice for projects that require rapid development and deployment.

  4. Themability: Gatsby offers a wide range of themes and starter kits that can be easily customized and tailored to suit specific design requirements. These themes provide a starting point for developers and help accelerate the development process. Hugo, on the other hand, has a more flexible theming system. Developers can create their own themes from scratch or choose from existing themes available in the Hugo themes repository. This flexibility allows for greater customization but can require more initial setup and configuration.

  5. Community and Learning Resources: Gatsby has a vibrant and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and learning resources. This makes it easy for developers to get started with Gatsby and find answers to their questions. Hugo also has a supportive community with a range of learning resources available, but it may not have the same level of activity and breadth as Gatsby's community.

  6. Hosting and Deployment Options: Gatsby websites can be deployed to various hosting platforms and services, including popular options like Netlify, Vercel, and AWS Amplify. This allows for seamless deployment and scaling of websites. Hugo, on the other hand, generates a static website that can be hosted on any web server or content delivery network (CDN) of choice. This gives developers more flexibility in terms of hosting options.

In Summary, Gatsby and Hugo differ in terms of the development language, plugin ecosystem, performance, themability, community support, and hosting options. Choosing between the two depends on specific project requirements, developer preferences, and familiarity with the respective technologies.

Advice on Gatsby and Hugo
Needs advice
on
GatsbyGatsbyHugoHugo
and
Next.jsNext.js
in

Hi everyone, I'm trying to decide which front-end tool, that will likely use server-side rendering (SSR), in hopes it'll be faster. The end-user will upload a document and they see text output on their screen (like SaaS or microservice). I read that Gatsby can also do SSR. Also want to add a headless CMS that is easy to use.

Backend is in Go. Open to ideas. Thank you.

See more
Replies (2)
Vishal Gupta
Senior Architect at Mindtree Ltd · | 3 upvotes · 26.7K views
Recommends
on
GatsbyGatsbyNext.jsNext.js

If your purpose is plain simply to upload a file which can handle by backend service than Gatsby is good enough assuming you have other content pages which will benefit from faster page loads for those Headless CMS driven pages. But if you have more logical/functional aspects like deciding content/personalization at server side of web application than choose NextJS.

See more
Leonard Daume
CTO - Doing the right things right at QYRAGY GmbH · | 2 upvotes · 5.2K views
Recommends
on
AstroAstroNext.jsNext.js

I have experience with Hugo and Next.js, but not with Gatsby. I would go with Next.js. However, I used Astro for my last project, so I would recommend Astro. Astro is much faster and you can use almost any frontend framework if you need to.

See more
Decisions about Gatsby and Hugo
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 161.6K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gatsby
Pros of Hugo
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Easy to connect with lots of CMS via official plugins
  • 9
    Reusable components (React)
  • 7
    Allows to use markdown files as articles
  • 5
    Static-sites
  • 5
    All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
  • 5
    Images
  • 4
    List of starters as base for new project
  • 3
    Easy to connect with Drupal via official plugin
  • 3
    Open source
  • 1
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 1
    Incremental Build
  • 47
    Lightning fast
  • 29
    Single Executable
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 24
    Great development community
  • 23
    Open source
  • 13
    Write in golang
  • 8
    Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
  • 8
    Hacker mindset
  • 7
    LiveReload built in
  • 4
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 4
    Easy to customize themes
  • 4
    Very fast builds
  • 3
    Well documented
  • 3
    Fast builds
  • 3
    Easy to learn

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gatsby
Cons of Hugo
  • 6
    No ssr
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 3
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 2
    For-profit
  • 2
    Slow builds
  • 2
    Flash of unstyled content issues
  • 1
    Problematic between develop and build commands
  • 1
    Difficult debugging
  • 1
    Too many dependencies
  • 1
    Plugin driven development
  • 1
    Difficult maintenance
  • 4
    No Plugins/Extensions
  • 2
    Template syntax not friendly
  • 1
    Quick builds

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Gatsby?

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

What is Hugo?

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Gatsby?
What companies use Hugo?
See which teams inside your own company are using Gatsby or Hugo.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Gatsby?
What tools integrate with Hugo?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitNode.jsFirebase+5
7
2343
What are some alternatives to Gatsby and Hugo?
Next.js
Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
Jekyll
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
Create React App
Create React apps with no build configuration.
WordPress
The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
See all alternatives