Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Helm vs containerd: What are the differences?
Introduction
Helm and containerd are both popular tools in the world of containerization, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. Understanding the key differences between Helm and containerd is important for choosing the right tool for managing your container deployments.
Packaging and Deployment: Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that provides a convenient way to package, distribute, and deploy applications on a Kubernetes cluster. It allows users to define, install, and manage applications using pre-configured charts. On the other hand, containerd is a container runtime that provides a low-level interface for managing containers. It focuses on the execution and management of container processes rather than application packaging and deployment.
Declarative vs Low-Level: Helm follows a declarative approach, where users define the desired state of their application using charts that contain all the necessary Kubernetes resource definitions. Helm then handles the installation and management of these resources to bring the application to the desired state. In contrast, containerd provides a low-level interface for managing containers, allowing users to directly interact with container images, runtimes, and containers. It provides greater flexibility and control over container operations but requires more manual configuration.
Scope and Extensibility: Helm is designed to work specifically with Kubernetes and focuses on managing applications and their dependencies within a Kubernetes cluster. It provides a rich ecosystem of charts and supports easy customization and extension through templates and values files. On the other hand, containerd is a more general-purpose container runtime that can be used with different orchestration systems and container tools. It is a core component of container platforms like Docker and Kubernetes but can also be used independently.
High-Level Abstractions vs Low-Level Operations: Helm abstracts many Kubernetes concepts and provides higher-level abstractions for managing applications. It simplifies the packaging, deployment, and lifecycle management of applications, providing developers with a consistent and straightforward way to manage complex application stacks. In contrast, containerd exposes lower-level container operations, allowing users to interact directly with container images, runtimes, and APIs. It provides greater control and flexibility but requires more in-depth knowledge of container internals.
Community and Ecosystem: Helm has a vibrant community and a rich ecosystem of officially maintained charts and plugins. It provides a centralized repository called Helm Hub for sharing and discovering charts. This enables developers to quickly get started with popular applications and services without reinventing the wheel. Containerd, on the other hand, has a growing community and is becoming a standard container runtime across different container platforms. Although it may not have the same level of community support and pre-built resources as Helm, it has strong industry backing.
Use Cases: Helm is well-suited for managing complex application deployments on Kubernetes, especially for multi-tier applications with numerous dependencies. It simplifies the packaging, release management, and environment-based configuration of applications. Containerd, on the other hand, is a more foundational tool that focuses on executing and managing containers at scale. It can be used in Kubernetes and non-Kubernetes environments and provides a powerful runtime for building container infrastructure.
In Summary, Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that simplifies application packaging and deployment using charts, while containerd is a low-level container runtime that provides a flexible and extensible interface for managing containers. Helm focuses on the declarative management of applications, while containerd provides a low-level execution and management layer for containers. The choice between Helm and containerd depends on the specific needs and requirements of your containerization projects.
Pros of containerd
- No Need for docker shim3
- Supports Kubernetes version greater than 1.212
- Needs docker shim to work on kubernetes0
- No kubernetes support after 1.220
Pros of Helm
- Infrastructure as code8
- Open source6
- Easy setup2
- Support1
- Testability and reproducibility1