StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Dns Management
  5. Google Cloud DNS vs Netlify

Google Cloud DNS vs Netlify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud DNS
Google Cloud DNS
Stacks2.4K
Followers572
Votes44
Netlify
Netlify
Stacks3.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes207

Google Cloud DNS vs Netlify: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between Google Cloud DNS and Netlify. Both platforms are used for managing and hosting websites, but they have distinct features that set them apart from each other.

  1. Scalability: Google Cloud DNS is a highly scalable and reliable managed DNS service that can handle large DNS zones and high query volumes without performance degradation. It is designed to support enterprise-level workloads and can efficiently handle millions of queries per second. On the other hand, Netlify is primarily a static site generator and hosting platform that is optimized for small to medium-sized websites. While it can handle a decent amount of traffic, it may not be as scalable as Google Cloud DNS for extremely high query volumes.

  2. Infrastructure Integration: Google Cloud DNS is tightly integrated with other Google Cloud services, enabling seamless DNS management for applications and services running on the Google Cloud Platform. It provides integration with services like Compute Engine, App Engine, and Cloud Load Balancing, making it easier to configure DNS records for these services. In contrast, Netlify is a standalone platform that focuses on simplifying the deployment and hosting of static websites. It does not have the same level of integration with a cloud infrastructure as Google Cloud DNS.

  3. DNS Management Capabilities: Google Cloud DNS offers a wide range of DNS management functionalities, including support for resource record types like A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, TXT, and more. It also supports advanced features like DNSSEC, which provides enhanced security for domain names. Additionally, it provides tools for managing DNS zones and records programmatically through APIs. Netlify, on the other hand, focuses more on the deployment and hosting aspects of websites and may not offer the same level of control and flexibility in DNS management.

  4. User Interface: Google Cloud DNS provides a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to manage their DNS zones and records visually. It offers a user-friendly interface with features like zone creation, record management, and search functionality. Netlify also has a web-based UI for managing websites, but it is more focused on deployment and content management rather than DNS management. The user interface of Netlify provides a streamlined workflow for site deployment and hosting.

  5. Pricing Model: Google Cloud DNS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on their usage of DNS queries and zone management. The pricing includes separate charges for DNS queries, DNS zone publication, and zone storage. In contrast, Netlify offers a freemium pricing model, where users can host a basic website for free. However, they have tiered pricing plans that provide additional features and resources for more advanced websites. The pricing of Netlify is mainly based on the features and resources utilized by the website.

  6. Managed vs Self-managed: Google Cloud DNS is a fully managed DNS service, meaning that Google handles the infrastructure and maintenance of the service. Users do not need to worry about server management or software updates. On the other hand, Netlify is a self-managed hosting platform, where users are responsible for deploying and maintaining their websites. While Netlify provides an easy-to-use interface and automated deployment workflows, users still have control over their site's configuration and management.

In summary, Google Cloud DNS is a highly scalable and enterprise-oriented managed DNS service that integrates well with other Google Cloud services. On the other hand, Netlify is a user-friendly hosting platform primarily focused on the deployment and hosting of static websites. While both platforms have their strengths, the choice between them depends on the specific needs and requirements of the website or application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud DNS, Netlify

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments
Eric
Eric

Service Engineer at Zix Corporation

Aug 5, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon Route 53Amazon Route 53

We are looking for advice / best-practices / caveats about migrating off BIND on to Unbound https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ for internal & external (customer-facing) DNS. Is unbound suitable for this, or is it only recommended for caching? How easy or difficult is it to move 10000's of existing BIND DNS zone entries? We already use Amazon Route 53 for our AWS instances and Cloud DNS for our GCP ones, but would like to maintain internal DNS for cost, control, and latency reasons.

58.6k views58.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud DNS
Google Cloud DNS
Netlify
Netlify

Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

High performance, reliable DNS service;Easy to use, customizable to your needs;Manage records for all your services
Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket
Statistics
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
3.6K
Followers
572
Followers
2.1K
Votes
44
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Backed by Google
  • 7
    High-availability
  • 6
    Reliable
  • 5
    High volume
  • 5
    Anycast DNS servers
Cons
  • 4
    Lack of privacy
  • 2
    Backed by Google
Pros
  • 48
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 23
    Super simple deploys
  • 23
    Free SSL support
  • 16
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
Cons
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud DNS, Netlify?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Amazon Route 53

Amazon Route 53

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

DNSimple

DNSimple

DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate!

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Dyn

Dyn

An all-in-one Managed DNS service for your registered domain names. Dyn DNS is the perfect solution for your domain name’s DNS needs, whether it is for personal or business use. It gives you complete control over your DNS zone and its associated DNS records, complete with a simple DNS management web interface.

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope