GitKraken vs Tower: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitKraken and Tower are both popular Git client software that offer a range of features to aid in version control and collaboration. While there are similarities between the two, there are also key differences that set them apart. In this analysis, we will highlight six notable differences between GitKraken and Tower.

1. User Interface Design: GitKraken is known for its visually appealing and intuitive UI, featuring a graph-based representation of commits and branches. On the other hand, Tower offers a more traditional and structured interface, with a focus on providing a comprehensive set of options and tools for managing Git repositories.

2. Integration with Third-Party Tools: GitKraken puts a strong emphasis on integrations and provides seamless integration with popular tools like Jira, Trello, Slack, and more, allowing for enhanced project management and communication. In contrast, Tower offers a more limited range of integrations, primarily focusing on deep integration with external diff and merge tools.

3. Platform Support: GitKraken is available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring broad compatibility across different operating systems. Tower, on the other hand, is limited to macOS and Windows, which may be a drawback for Linux users or those who prefer cross-platform solutions.

4. Pricing Model: GitKraken offers both free and paid versions, with the paid version unlocking additional features such as unlimited Glo Boards, code review, and priority support. Tower, on the other hand, follows a traditional licensing model with a one-time purchase fee, making it more suitable for larger teams or organizations looking for long-term cost savings.

5. GitFlow Workflow Support: GitKraken provides built-in support for the popular GitFlow workflow, allowing users to easily create and manage branches by following the GitFlow branching model. Tower, while not having native GitFlow support, offers comprehensive branch management capabilities that can adapt to various branching strategies, including GitFlow.

6. Code Review Capabilities: GitKraken offers a built-in code review functionality that allows team members to collaborate and provide feedback on code changes directly within the application. This feature enhances the code review process by providing a centralized and streamlined approach. Tower, on the other hand, lacks a built-in code review feature, requiring users to rely on external code review tools or services.

In Summary, GitKraken and Tower differ in their UI design, integration options, platform support, pricing model, GitFlow workflow support, and code review capabilities. These differences make them suitable for different user preferences and requirements in the realm of Git client software.