StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Git Tools
  5. Git Extensions vs Git LFS

Git Extensions vs Git LFS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git LFS
Git LFS
Stacks14
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.8K
Forks2.2K
Git Extensions
Git Extensions
Stacks19
Followers20
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.2K
Forks2.2K

Git Extensions vs Git LFS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git Extensions and Git LFS are both tools used in conjunction with Git for managing and versioning files. While they both serve similar purposes, there are distinct differences between the two.

  1. File Storage: Git Extensions is primarily used for managing the source code of a project, whereas Git LFS (Large File Storage) is specifically designed for tracking and storing large files such as media files, graphics, and other non-textual assets. Git LFS replaces large files with text pointers, allowing for faster and more efficient cloning and fetching of repositories.

  2. Storage Size: Git Extensions stores all files within the local repository, increasing the overall size of the repository. In contrast, Git LFS stores large files externally, reducing the size of the repository. This reduces the time required to clone or fetch the repository and minimizes the impact on storage resources.

  3. File Tracking: Git Extensions tracks changes to all files within the repository, regardless of size. On the other hand, Git LFS specifically tracks changes to large files that are managed using Git LFS, while other files are tracked as regular Git files. This ensures that only large files are managed using Git LFS, optimizing the performance of the repository.

  4. Configuration: Git Extensions requires minimal additional configuration to start using, as it is integrated directly into Git. Git LFS, on the other hand, requires installation and configuration of an additional extension to Git. This involves setting up Git LFS on each local machine and configuring the repositories to use Git LFS.

  5. Compatibility: Git Extensions can be used with any Git hosting service that supports the Git protocol. Git LFS, on the other hand, requires the hosting service to have Git LFS support enabled. Not all hosting services support Git LFS out of the box, so it may require additional setup steps or alternative hosting options.

  6. Workflow Integration: Git Extensions integrates seamlessly with Git and supports all Git operations and workflows without any additional steps. Git LFS, on the other hand, requires specific commands or flags to be used for managing large files, such as pushing or pulling them using Git LFS. This adds an extra layer of complexity to the workflow, specifically for large files.

In summary, Git Extensions is a versatile tool for managing source code, while Git LFS is specifically designed for efficient tracking and storing of large files. Git Extensions stores files within the repository, while Git LFS stores large files externally. Git LFS requires additional configuration and compatibility considerations compared to Git Extensions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git LFS
Git LFS
Git Extensions
Git Extensions

It replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server like GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.

It is a standalone UI tool for managing git repositories. It also integrates with Windows Explorer and Microsoft Visual Studio.

Large file versioning; More repository space; Faster cloning and fetching; Same Git workflow; Same access controls and permissions
Windows Explorer integration for Git; Visual Studio (2015/2017/2019) plugin (download); Feature rich user interface for Git
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.8K
GitHub Stars
8.2K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
14
Stacks
19
Followers
11
Followers
20
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to Git LFS, Git Extensions?

Diff So Fancy

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana