XRebel vs Fody Comparison | StackShare | StackShare

Fody vs XRebel

Overview

XRebel

Stacks2

Followers5

Votes0

Fody

Stacks38

Followers3

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.5K

Forks473

XRebel vs Fody: What are the differences?

Developers describe XRebel as "Java code analysis tool". It does things traditional profiling tools can’t. It allows developers to trace the impact of their code from beginning to end -- even in distributed applications. This, combined with real-time Java performance metrics, makes it a must-have tool for any Java developer. With this tool, developers can create better-performing applications that lead to better end user experience. On the other hand, Fody is detailed as "Extensible tool for weaving .net assemblies". Manipulating the IL of an assembly as part of a build requires a significant amount of plumbing code. This plumbing code involves knowledge of both the MSBuild and Visual Studio APIs. It attempts to eliminate that plumbing code through an extensible add-in model.

XRebel and Fody are primarily classified as "Java" and "Code Review" tools respectively.

Detailed Comparison

XRebel	Fody
It does things traditional profiling tools can’t. It allows developers to trace the impact of their code from beginning to end -- even in distributed applications. This, combined with real-time Java performance metrics, makes it a must-have tool for any Java developer. With this tool, developers can create better-performing applications that lead to better end user experience.	Manipulating the IL of an assembly as part of a build requires a significant amount of plumbing code. This plumbing code involves knowledge of both the MSBuild and Visual Studio APIs. It attempts to eliminate that plumbing code through an extensible add-in model.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 473
Stacks 2	Stacks 38
Followers 5	Followers 3
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to XRebel, Fody?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.