Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Fluentd vs Metricbeat: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Fluentd and Metricbeat
Fluentd and Metricbeat are both popular open-source tools used for collecting and forwarding log data, but there are several key differences between them. Here are the main disparities:
Architecture: Fluentd is a log collector, aggregator, and integrator, while Metricbeat focuses specifically on collecting metrics about the system and services. Fluentd can process both structured and unstructured data, whereas Metricbeat focuses solely on metric data.
Data Sources: Fluentd is designed to collect data from various sources, such as log files, syslog, and application logs. On the other hand, Metricbeat primarily collects data from system resources like CPU usage, memory, disk IO, and network traffic.
Integration: Fluentd offers a wide range of plugins for integrating with various services and platforms, enabling easy data analysis and storage. In contrast, Metricbeat is more focused on integration with the Elastic Stack, providing seamless integration with Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash.
Monitoring: Fluentd provides monitoring capabilities, allowing users to monitor the throughput, latency, and error rates of their log data pipelines. Metricbeat, on the other hand, focuses on monitoring system metrics like CPU usage, memory utilization, and network traffic.
Configuration: Fluentd uses a flexible and powerful configuration language that allows users to define complex data processing and filtering rules, making it highly configurable. Metricbeat, on the other hand, uses configuration files written in YAML to specify the metrics to be collected and exported.
Community and Ecosystem: Fluentd has a larger community and a broader ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and extensions available for various use cases. Metricbeat, being a part of the Elastic Stack, benefits from the extensive community and ecosystem around Elastic products.
In summary, Fluentd and Metricbeat differ in architecture, data sources, integration capabilities, monitoring features, configuration methods, and community/ecosystem support.
Hi, We have a situation, where we are using Prometheus to get system metrics from PCF (Pivotal Cloud Foundry) platform. We send that as time-series data to Cortex via a Prometheus server and built a dashboard using Grafana. There is another pipeline where we need to read metrics from a Linux server using Metricbeat, CPU, memory, and Disk. That will be sent to Elasticsearch and Grafana will pull and show the data in a dashboard.
Is it OK to use Metricbeat for Linux server or can we use Prometheus?
What is the difference in system metrics sent by Metricbeat and Prometheus node exporters?
Regards, Sunil.
If you're already using Prometheus for your system metrics, then it seems like standing up Elasticsearch just for Linux host monitoring is excessive. The node_exporter is probably sufficient if you'e looking for standard system metrics.
Another thing to consider is that Metricbeat / ELK use a push model for metrics delivery, whereas Prometheus pulls metrics from each node it is monitoring. Depending on how you manage your network security, opting for one solution over two may make things simpler.
Hi Sunil! Unfortunately, I don´t have much experience with Metricbeat so I can´t advise on the diffs with Prometheus...for Linux server, I encourage you to use Prometheus node exporter and for PCF, I would recommend using the instana tile (https://www.instana.com/supported-technologies/pivotal-cloud-foundry/). Let me know if you have further questions! Regards Jose
Pros of Fluentd
- Open-source11
- Easy9
- Great for Kubernetes node container log forwarding9
- Lightweight9
Pros of Metricbeat
- Simple2
- Easy to setup1