Apache Flume vs Fluentd

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Flume

48
119
+ 1
0
Fluentd

638
682
+ 1
37
Add tool

Apache Flume vs Fluentd: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Flume and Fluentd are both popular open source data collection tools used in modern data architectures. They provide a way to efficiently collect, aggregate, and transport large volumes of log and event data in real-time. Despite having similar goals, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture:

    • Apache Flume is based on a distributed, fault-tolerant streaming architecture. It uses a data flow model where events are passed through a series of channels, sinks, and sources. Each component can be scaled horizontally to handle high volumes of data efficiently.
    • Fluentd, on the other hand, follows a decentralized architecture. It uses a multiprocess model where each component operates independently and communicates with other components using a unified logging layer. This architecture provides flexibility and allows for better fault tolerance.
  2. Ease of Use:

    • Apache Flume has a simple configuration process that requires minimal coding. It provides a standardized set of components and sinks, making it easy to set up and configure data pipelines.
    • Fluentd offers a more flexible and extensible configuration process. It supports a wide range of input and output plugins, allowing users to customize the data collection process. However, this flexibility can be overwhelming for users who prefer a simpler setup.
  3. Community and Ecosystem:

    • Apache Flume has a large and active community with a well-established ecosystem. It has been around for a longer time, which means there are more plugins, connectors, and integrations available. This makes it easier to integrate Flume with various data sources and sinks.
    • Fluentd also has a growing community, but it is relatively younger compared to Flume. It has a wide range of plugins available for various data sources and sinks, but the ecosystem is not as extensive as Flume's.
  4. Scalability:

    • Apache Flume is designed to handle high data volumes efficiently and can scale horizontally by adding more agents or machines. It provides built-in load balancing and failover mechanisms, making it suitable for large-scale deployments.
    • Fluentd is also designed to handle high data volumes efficiently, but it relies on the underlying infrastructure for scalability. It can work well with containerized environments and can scale horizontally by spreading the workload across multiple instances.
  5. Data Transformation and Enrichment:

    • Apache Flume provides limited support for data transformation. It mainly focuses on collecting and transporting data. Users can perform basic transformations using Flume's built-in interceptors or customize the code to add more complex transformations.
    • Fluentd, on the other hand, offers powerful data transformation capabilities. It provides a flexible plugin system that allows users to enrich, filter, and transform data in real-time. This makes Fluentd a preferred choice for users who require advanced data processing.
  6. Compatibility:

    • Apache Flume has better compatibility with existing Hadoop ecosystem tools and frameworks. It integrates seamlessly with Apache Hadoop, Apache Kafka, and other big data technologies.
    • Fluentd is designed to work well in cloud-native environments and has better compatibility with containerized applications and platforms. It can collect and process logs from various cloud services and container orchestration systems.

In summary, Apache Flume and Fluentd are both powerful data collection tools with distinct differences. Flume excels in its distributed architecture, simplicity, and compatibility with Hadoop ecosystem tools. On the other hand, Fluentd offers flexibility, extensibility, and advanced data transformation capabilities, making it suitable for cloud-native environments and advanced data processing needs.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache Flume
Pros of Fluentd
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 11
      Open-source
    • 9
      Great for Kubernetes node container log forwarding
    • 9
      Lightweight
    • 8
      Easy

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    No Stats
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Apache Flume?

    It is a distributed, reliable, and available service for efficiently collecting, aggregating, and moving large amounts of log data. It has a simple and flexible architecture based on streaming data flows. It is robust and fault tolerant with tunable reliability mechanisms and many failover and recovery mechanisms. It uses a simple extensible data model that allows for online analytic application.

    What is Fluentd?

    Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Apache Flume?
    What companies use Fluentd?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Flume or Fluentd.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Apache Flume?
    What tools integrate with Fluentd?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
      5
      1486
      What are some alternatives to Apache Flume and Fluentd?
      Apache Spark
      Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
      Logstash
      Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.
      Apache Storm
      Apache Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm has many use cases: realtime analytics, online machine learning, continuous computation, distributed RPC, ETL, and more. Storm is fast: a benchmark clocked it at over a million tuples processed per second per node. It is scalable, fault-tolerant, guarantees your data will be processed, and is easy to set up and operate.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      Apache Flink
      Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.
      See all alternatives