StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Fisheye vs Review Board

Fisheye vs Review Board

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Review Board
Review Board
Stacks19
Followers52
Votes6
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks435
Fisheye
Fisheye
Stacks40
Followers41
Votes0

Fisheye vs Review Board: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Fisheye and Review Board, highlighting key differences between the two tools.

1. **Integrations**: Fisheye offers deep integrations with JIRA, Bitbucket, and Crucible, providing seamless collaboration among development tools. On the other hand, Review Board primarily focuses on integration with Git, Subversion, Mercurial, and Perforce, catering to a wide range of version control systems.
2. **User Interface**: Fisheye offers a user-friendly interface with a strong emphasis on code navigation and visualization, making it easier for users to understand code changes. In contrast, Review Board provides a simplified and clean interface focused on code reviews, facilitating efficient collaboration among team members.
3. **Supported Workflows**: Fisheye is more suitable for teams looking for powerful code analytics and insights, enabling them to track code changes and visualize repository data effectively. Review Board, on the other hand, excels in facilitating code review processes, serving as a dedicated platform for discussing, reviewing, and approving code modifications.
4. **Collaboration Features**: Fisheye emphasizes providing visibility into code repositories and facilitating code exploration, enabling users to access detailed information about code history and revisions. Conversely, Review Board focuses on fostering collaboration through code reviews, allowing team members to provide feedback, suggest improvements, and make decisions on code changes.
5. **Code Review Capabilities**: Fisheye offers basic code review capabilities but mainly focuses on code analysis and repository management functionalities. In contrast, Review Board is designed specifically for conducting in-depth code reviews, providing users with advanced review features such as diff viewing, commenting, and revision tracking.
6. **Scalability**: Fisheye is more scalable for large code repositories and organizations due to its comprehensive code analysis capabilities and performance optimizations. Review Board, while suitable for smaller to medium-sized teams, may face scalability challenges when dealing with extensive codebases and complex development projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Fisheye and Review Board lie in their integrations, user interface design, supported workflows, collaboration features, code review capabilities, and scalability for different types of development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Review Board
Review Board
Fisheye
Fisheye

Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.

FishEye provides a read-only window into your Subversion, Perforce, CVS, Git, and Mercurial repositories, all in one place. Keep a pulse on everything about your code: Visualize and report on activity, integrate source with JIRA issues, and search for commits, files, revisions, or people.

Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews
Track code activity in one place;Cross-version control support;Code search;Commit graph
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
435
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
19
Stacks
40
Followers
52
Followers
41
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Simple to use. Great UI
  • 1
    Diff between review versions
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Review Bots
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
Slack
Slack
iDoneThis
iDoneThis
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
CircleCI
CircleCI
GitLab
GitLab
Trello
Trello
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Perforce
Perforce
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to Review Board, Fisheye?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana