Elasticsearch vs Searchkick

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Elasticsearch

34.4K
26.8K
+ 1
1.6K
Searchkick

17
32
+ 1
1
Add tool

Elasticsearch vs Searchkick: What are the differences?

Introduction

Elasticsearch and Searchkick are both powerful search engines that are frequently used in websites or applications. While they share some similarities, there are distinct differences between the two.

  1. Data Storage: Elasticsearch uses Apache Lucene as its underlying data storage mechanism, which divides data into shards for distributed storage and querying. On the other hand, Searchkick relies on Elasticsearch for data storage, with no direct control over how data is divided and stored.

  2. Querying: Elasticsearch offers a wide range of search options, including full-text search, filtering, faceting, and aggregations. It also supports complex queries and scoring algorithms. In comparison, Searchkick provides a simpler querying interface focused on full-text search and filtering.

  3. Indexing and Synchronization: Elasticsearch allows near-real-time indexing, meaning that documents are available for search within a short time frame after being indexed. Searchkick, however, relies on Elasticsearch's indexing capabilities, and any changes made to the indexed documents may introduce some delay before they become searchable.

  4. Scalability: Elasticsearch is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data and high traffic loads. It provides built-in support for scaling horizontally by distributing data across multiple servers. Searchkick leverages Elasticsearch's scalability features, making it capable of handling high volumes of searches and data.

  5. Configuration and Customization: Elasticsearch offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to fine-tune various aspects of search and indexing. It provides a broad set of APIs for customization as well as built-in features for analysis, highlighting, and suggestions. In contrast, Searchkick simplifies the configuration process and provides a more opinionated approach with fewer customization options.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a vast and active community that contributes to its open-source development and provides numerous plugins and integrations. It has been widely adopted and has extensive documentation and support resources. While Searchkick benefits from Elasticsearch's ecosystem, it has a smaller community and may have fewer plugins and integrations available.

In summary, Elasticsearch and Searchkick differ in data storage, querying capabilities, indexing and synchronization approaches, scalability features, configuration options, and community support.

Advice on Elasticsearch and Searchkick
Rana Usman Shahid
Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza · | 6 upvotes · 384.8K views
Needs advice
on
AlgoliaAlgoliaElasticsearchElasticsearch
and
FirebaseFirebase

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

See more
Replies (2)
Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit · | 8 upvotes · 288K views
Recommends
on
AlgoliaAlgolia

Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.

To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.

See more
Mike Endale
Recommends
on
Cloud FirestoreCloud Firestore

Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.

For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.

Hope this helps.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Elasticsearch
Pros of Searchkick
  • 328
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
  • 98
    Free
  • 85
    Search everything
  • 54
    Easy to get started
  • 45
    Analytics
  • 26
    Distributed
  • 6
    Fast search
  • 5
    More than a search engine
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Awesome, great tool
  • 3
    Highly Available
  • 3
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Potato
  • 2
    Document Store
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Intuitive API
  • 2
    Nosql DB
  • 2
    Great piece of software
  • 2
    Reliable
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Open
  • 1
    Easy to get hot data
  • 1
    Github
  • 1
    Elaticsearch
  • 1
    Actively developing
  • 1
    Responsive maintainers on GitHub
  • 1
    Ecosystem
  • 1
    Not stable
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 0
    Community
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Elasticsearch
Cons of Searchkick
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Elasticsearch?

    Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

    What is Searchkick?

    Searchkick learns what your users are looking for. As more people search, it gets smarter and the results get better. It’s friendly for developers - and magical for your users.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Elasticsearch and Searchkick as a desired skillset
    What companies use Elasticsearch?
    What companies use Searchkick?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Elasticsearch?
    What tools integrate with Searchkick?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      May 21 2019 at 12:20AM

      Elastic

      ElasticsearchKibanaLogstash+4
      12
      5245
      GitHubPythonReact+42
      49
      40854
      GitHubPythonNode.js+47
      55
      72631
      What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch and Searchkick?
      Datadog
      Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
      Solr
      Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.
      Lucene
      Lucene Core, our flagship sub-project, provides Java-based indexing and search technology, as well as spellchecking, hit highlighting and advanced analysis/tokenization capabilities.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Algolia
      Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.
      See all alternatives