Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs Searchkick: What are the differences?
Introduction
Elasticsearch and Searchkick are both powerful search engines that are frequently used in websites or applications. While they share some similarities, there are distinct differences between the two.
Data Storage: Elasticsearch uses Apache Lucene as its underlying data storage mechanism, which divides data into shards for distributed storage and querying. On the other hand, Searchkick relies on Elasticsearch for data storage, with no direct control over how data is divided and stored.
Querying: Elasticsearch offers a wide range of search options, including full-text search, filtering, faceting, and aggregations. It also supports complex queries and scoring algorithms. In comparison, Searchkick provides a simpler querying interface focused on full-text search and filtering.
Indexing and Synchronization: Elasticsearch allows near-real-time indexing, meaning that documents are available for search within a short time frame after being indexed. Searchkick, however, relies on Elasticsearch's indexing capabilities, and any changes made to the indexed documents may introduce some delay before they become searchable.
Scalability: Elasticsearch is designed to be highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data and high traffic loads. It provides built-in support for scaling horizontally by distributing data across multiple servers. Searchkick leverages Elasticsearch's scalability features, making it capable of handling high volumes of searches and data.
Configuration and Customization: Elasticsearch offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to fine-tune various aspects of search and indexing. It provides a broad set of APIs for customization as well as built-in features for analysis, highlighting, and suggestions. In contrast, Searchkick simplifies the configuration process and provides a more opinionated approach with fewer customization options.
Community and Ecosystem: Elasticsearch has a vast and active community that contributes to its open-source development and provides numerous plugins and integrations. It has been widely adopted and has extensive documentation and support resources. While Searchkick benefits from Elasticsearch's ecosystem, it has a smaller community and may have fewer plugins and integrations available.
In summary, Elasticsearch and Searchkick differ in data storage, querying capabilities, indexing and synchronization approaches, scalability features, configuration options, and community support.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api328
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Great docs4
- Awesome, great tool4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Potato2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Nosql DB2
- Great piece of software2
- Reliable2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Open1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Not stable1
- Scalability1
- Community0
Pros of Searchkick
- Open Source1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4