Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Glue

452
804
+ 1
9
Databricks

476
724
+ 1
8
Add tool

AWS Glue vs Databricks: What are the differences?

AWS Glue and Databricks are both popular data processing and analytics platforms, but they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. In this comparison, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Managed Service vs Collaborative Workspace: AWS Glue is a fully managed ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) service provided by Amazon Web Services. It automates the entire process of discovering, cataloging, and transforming data into a usable format. On the other hand, Databricks is a collaborative workspace that provides a unified analytics platform. It combines data engineering capabilities along with advanced analytics, machine learning, and visualization features.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Glue is designed to be highly scalable, allowing you to process large volumes of data efficiently. It automatically scales resources based on the size of the data and the complexity of the transformations. Databricks, on the other hand, provides a flexible and scalable environment for data analytics and processing. It offers the ability to scale compute and storage resources independently, providing more granular control over resource allocation.

  3. Data Lake vs Data Warehouse: AWS Glue is often used as a tool to build data lakes by consolidating data from various sources and making it available for analysis. It is well-integrated with other AWS services like Amazon S3, Redshift, and Athena, enabling seamless data ingestion and transformation. Databricks, on the other hand, focuses more on data warehouse capabilities and provides tight integration with popular data warehousing solutions like Delta Lake and Apache Spark.

  4. Integration with Ecosystem: AWS Glue seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, allowing you to build end-to-end data processing pipelines using services like AWS Lambda, AWS Step Functions, and AWS Glue Spark ETL jobs. Databricks also offers integration with various third-party tools and services, making it easier to connect with different data sources and systems.

  5. Machine Learning Capabilities: Databricks provides extensive support for machine learning and advanced analytics with built-in libraries like MLlib and MLflow. It offers a collaborative environment for data scientists and data engineers to build, deploy, and manage machine learning models. AWS Glue, on the other hand, is primarily focused on data processing and ETL, and does not provide as many built-in machine learning capabilities compared to Databricks.

  6. Pricing Model: AWS Glue pricing is based on the number of data catalog objects, crawler runs, and development endpoints used. It also charges for the amount of data processed during ETL jobs. Databricks follows a consumption-based pricing model, where you pay for the resources you use, such as compute instances and storage.

In summary, AWS Glue is a fully managed ETL service focusing on data integration and processing in the AWS ecosystem, while Databricks is a collaborative workspace that provides a unified analytics platform with powerful machine learning capabilities. The choice between the two depends on your specific use case, whether you need a fully managed service for ETL or a collaborative environment for advanced analytics and machine learning.

Advice on AWS Glue and Databricks

We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to

  • keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
  • give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
  • move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments

We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.

See more
Replies (3)
John Nguyen
Recommends
on
AirflowAirflowAWS LambdaAWS Lambda

You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.

But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.

See more
Recommends
on
AirflowAirflow

Though we have always built something custom, Apache airflow (https://airflow.apache.org/) stood out as a key contender/alternative when it comes to open sources. On the commercial offering, Amazon Redshift combined with Amazon Kinesis (for complex manipulations) is great for BI, though Redshift as such is expensive.

See more
Recommends

You may want to look into a Data Virtualization product called Conduit. It connects to disparate data sources in AWS, on prem, Azure, GCP, and exposes them as a single unified Spark SQL view to PowerBI (direct query) or Tableau. Allows auto query and caching policies to enhance query speeds and experience. Has a GPU query engine and optimized Spark for fallback. Can be deployed on your AWS VM or on prem, scales up and out. Sounds like the ideal solution to your needs.

See more
Vamshi Krishna
Data Engineer at Tata Consultancy Services · | 4 upvotes · 241K views

I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?

See more

Hi all,

Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?

See more
Replies (4)

you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster

See more
Carlos Acedo
Data Technologies Manager at SDG Group Iberia · | 5 upvotes · 232.7K views
Recommends
on
Amazon RedshiftAmazon Redshift

First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.

Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.

I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.

See more
Alexis Blandin
Recommends
on
Amazon AthenaAmazon Athena

It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift

See more
Recommends

you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Glue
Pros of Databricks
  • 9
    Managed Hive Metastore
  • 1
    Best Performances on large datasets
  • 1
    True lakehouse architecture
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 1
    Databricks doesn't get access to your data
  • 1
    Usage Based Billing
  • 1
    Security
  • 1
    Data stays in your cloud account
  • 1
    Multicloud

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is AWS Glue?

A fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy for customers to prepare and load their data for analytics.

What is Databricks?

Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, from the original creators of Apache Spark™, unifies data science and engineering across the Machine Learning lifecycle from data preparation to experimentation and deployment of ML applications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention AWS Glue and Databricks as a desired skillset
What companies use AWS Glue?
What companies use Databricks?
See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Glue or Databricks.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS Glue?
What tools integrate with Databricks?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

Segment

PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
7
2551
What are some alternatives to AWS Glue and Databricks?
AWS Data Pipeline
AWS Data Pipeline is a web service that provides a simple management system for data-driven workflows. Using AWS Data Pipeline, you define a pipeline composed of the “data sources” that contain your data, the “activities” or business logic such as EMR jobs or SQL queries, and the “schedule” on which your business logic executes. For example, you could define a job that, every hour, runs an Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR)–based analysis on that hour’s Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) log data, loads the results into a relational database for future lookup, and then automatically sends you a daily summary email.
Airflow
Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
Talend
It is an open source software integration platform helps you in effortlessly turning data into business insights. It uses native code generation that lets you run your data pipelines seamlessly across all cloud providers and get optimized performance on all platforms.
Alooma
Get the power of big data in minutes with Alooma and Amazon Redshift. Simply build your pipelines and map your events using Alooma’s friendly mapping interface. Query, analyze, visualize, and predict now.
See all alternatives