Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Crucible vs Reviewable: What are the differences?
Crucible: Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects. Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects with Crucible's flexible review workflow. It's code review made easy for Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and more; Reviewable: GitHub code reviews done right. A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.
Crucible and Reviewable can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.
Some of the features offered by Crucible are:
- Workflow-based reviews
- Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets
- Create reviews from the command line
On the other hand, Reviewable provides the following key features:
- See only what changed since last time you looked (even if rebased).
- Instantly diff any two revisions of a file, in one or two columns.
- Customize code font, syntax highlighting, max line length.
"JIRA Integration" is the primary reason why developers consider Crucible over the competitors, whereas "Batch commenting" was stated as the key factor in picking Reviewable.
Pros of Crucible
- JIRA Integration5
- Post-commit preview4
- Has a linux version2
- Pre-commit preview1
Pros of Reviewable
- Batch commenting5
- Makes me feel organised and in control4
- Easy to use4
- Easy incremental reviewing3
- Efficient comment paging3
- Manual review of c c++ in eclipse and c# code in vs1
- Language agnostic1
- Focused on code reviews1
- Free for OSS1
