CoreNLP vs SpaCy

Overview

SpaCy

Stacks220

Followers301

Votes14

GitHub Stars32.8K

Forks4.6K

CoreNLP

Stacks19

Followers23

Votes1

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.7K

CoreNLP vs SpaCy: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between CoreNLP and SpaCy, two popular natural language processing libraries. CoreNLP is a Java-based library developed by Stanford University, while SpaCy is a Python-based library developed by Explosion AI. Both libraries offer a wide range of functionalities for text processing, but they differ in various aspects.

Linguistic Features: CoreNLP provides a comprehensive set of linguistic features, including part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, dependency parsing, and coreference resolution. SpaCy also offers similar features but with a focus on speed and efficiency. It provides pre-trained models for a variety of languages and has support for more linguistic annotations compared to CoreNLP.
Language Support: CoreNLP supports multiple languages, including English, Chinese, Spanish, German, French, and Arabic. SpaCy also supports multiple languages and covers a wide range of languages including English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese, and others. However, the language coverage in SpaCy may vary depending on the availability of pre-trained models for specific languages.
Programming Language: CoreNLP is implemented in Java, which makes it suitable for Java-based applications. On the other hand, SpaCy is implemented in Python, making it more convenient for Python-based projects. This difference in programming language may influence the choice of library depending on the requirements of the project.
Ease of Use: CoreNLP requires a separate installation and setup process as it is a standalone Java application. It requires setting up of a server for processing text. In contrast, SpaCy can be easily installed using Python's package manager and used directly within Python code. This ease of installation and integration makes SpaCy more accessible for developers.
Tokenization: CoreNLP follows a rule-based approach for tokenization, which may result in some limitations when dealing with complex tokenization patterns. SpaCy, on the other hand, uses a statistical model-based approach for tokenization, which generally performs better in handling complex tokenization scenarios.
Performance: SpaCy is known for its high performance and efficiency. It is optimized for speed and has been benchmarked as one of the fastest NLP libraries available. CoreNLP, although powerful, may not provide the same level of speed and efficiency as SpaCy in large-scale text processing tasks.

In summary, CoreNLP and SpaCy differ in terms of their linguistic features, language support, programming language, ease of use, tokenization approach, and performance. Choosing between the two libraries depends on specific requirements, available language support, programming language preference, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SpaCy	CoreNLP
It is a library for advanced Natural Language Processing in Python and Cython. It's built on the very latest research, and was designed from day one to be used in real products. It comes with pre-trained statistical models and word vectors, and currently supports tokenization for 49+ languages.	It provides a set of natural language analysis tools written in Java. It can take raw human language text input and give the base forms of words, their parts of speech, whether they are names of companies, people, etc., normalize and interpret dates, times, and numeric quantities, mark up the structure of sentences in terms of phrases or word dependencies, and indicate which noun phrases refer to the same entities.
-	An integrated NLP toolkit with a broad range of grammatical analysis tools; A fast, robust annotator for arbitrary texts, widely used in production; A modern, regularly updated package, with the overall highest quality text analytics; Support for a number of major (human) languages; Available APIs for most major modern programming languages Ability to run as a simple web service
Statistics
GitHub Stars 32.8K	GitHub Stars 10.0K
GitHub Forks 4.6K	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 220	Stacks 19
Followers 301	Followers 23
Votes 14	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Speed 2 No vendor lock-in Cons 1 Requires creating a training set and managing training	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Java JavaScript Python

What are some alternatives to SpaCy, CoreNLP?

rasa NLU

rasa NLU (Natural Language Understanding) is a tool for intent classification and entity extraction. You can think of rasa NLU as a set of high level APIs for building your own language parser using existing NLP and ML libraries.

Speechly

It can be used to complement any regular touch user interface with a real time voice user interface. It offers real time feedback for faster and more intuitive experience that enables end user to recover from possible errors quickly and with no interruptions.

MonkeyLearn

Turn emails, tweets, surveys or any text into actionable data. Automate business workflows and saveExtract and classify information from text. Integrate with your App within minutes. Get started for free.

Jina

It is geared towards building search systems for any kind of data, including text, images, audio, video and many more. With the modular design & multi-layer abstraction, you can leverage the efficient patterns to build the system by parts, or chaining them into a Flow for an end-to-end experience.

Sentence Transformers

It provides an easy method to compute dense vector representations for sentences, paragraphs, and images. The models are based on transformer networks like BERT / RoBERTa / XLM-RoBERTa etc. and achieve state-of-the-art performance in various tasks.

FastText

It is an open-source, free, lightweight library that allows users to learn text representations and text classifiers. It works on standard, generic hardware. Models can later be reduced in size to even fit on mobile devices.

Flair

Flair allows you to apply our state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models to your text, such as named entity recognition (NER), part-of-speech tagging (PoS), sense disambiguation and classification.

Transformers

It provides general-purpose architectures (BERT, GPT-2, RoBERTa, XLM, DistilBert, XLNet…) for Natural Language Understanding (NLU) and Natural Language Generation (NLG) with over 32+ pretrained models in 100+ languages and deep interoperability between TensorFlow 2.0 and PyTorch.

Gensim

It is a Python library for topic modelling, document indexing and similarity retrieval with large corpora. Target audience is the natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR) community.

Amazon Comprehend

Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to discover insights from text. Amazon Comprehend provides Keyphrase Extraction, Sentiment Analysis, Entity Recognition, Topic Modeling, and Language Detection APIs so you can easily integrate natural language processing into your applications.

Related Comparisons

CoreNLP vs SpaCy: What are the differences?

Introduction

Linguistic Features: CoreNLP provides a comprehensive set of linguistic features, including part-of-speech tagging, named entity recognition, dependency parsing, and coreference resolution. SpaCy also offers similar features but with a focus on speed and efficiency. It provides pre-trained models for a variety of languages and has support for more linguistic annotations compared to CoreNLP.
Language Support: CoreNLP supports multiple languages, including English, Chinese, Spanish, German, French, and Arabic. SpaCy also supports multiple languages and covers a wide range of languages including English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese, and others. However, the language coverage in SpaCy may vary depending on the availability of pre-trained models for specific languages.
Programming Language: CoreNLP is implemented in Java, which makes it suitable for Java-based applications. On the other hand, SpaCy is implemented in Python, making it more convenient for Python-based projects. This difference in programming language may influence the choice of library depending on the requirements of the project.
Ease of Use: CoreNLP requires a separate installation and setup process as it is a standalone Java application. It requires setting up of a server for processing text. In contrast, SpaCy can be easily installed using Python's package manager and used directly within Python code. This ease of installation and integration makes SpaCy more accessible for developers.
Tokenization: CoreNLP follows a rule-based approach for tokenization, which may result in some limitations when dealing with complex tokenization patterns. SpaCy, on the other hand, uses a statistical model-based approach for tokenization, which generally performs better in handling complex tokenization scenarios.
Performance: SpaCy is known for its high performance and efficiency. It is optimized for speed and has been benchmarked as one of the fastest NLP libraries available. CoreNLP, although powerful, may not provide the same level of speed and efficiency as SpaCy in large-scale text processing tasks.

CoreNLP vs SpaCy

Overview

CoreNLP vs SpaCy: What are the differences?