StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. ConEmu vs Hyper Terminal

ConEmu vs Hyper Terminal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ConEmu
ConEmu
Stacks30
Followers38
Votes0
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal
Stacks105
Followers165
Votes0

ConEmu vs Hyper Terminal: What are the differences?

# Introduction

ConEmu and Hyper Terminal are both popular terminal emulator applications used by developers to interact with the command line. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that may influence a developer's choice of which terminal emulator to use.

## Key Differences between ConEmu and Hyper Terminal

1. **Compatibility with Operating Systems**: ConEmu is primarily designed for Windows operating systems, providing extensive customization options and support for different shells like PowerShell and Command Prompt. On the other hand, Hyper Terminal is a cross-platform application that can be used on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a versatile choice for developers who work on multiple operating systems.

2. **User Interface Customization**: ConEmu offers a wide range of customization options for the terminal interface, allowing users to adjust colors, fonts, and layout to suit their preferences. Alternatively, Hyper Terminal focuses on simplicity and minimalism, providing a clean and modern interface without extensive customization features. Developers who prioritize UI flexibility may prefer ConEmu, while those who prefer a streamlined user experience may opt for Hyper Terminal.

3. **Resource Usage**: ConEmu is known for being lightweight and efficient in terms of resource usage, making it a suitable choice for developers who prioritize performance and responsiveness. In contrast, Hyper Terminal may consume more system resources, particularly in heavy usage scenarios, which could impact overall system performance. Developers working on resource-intensive tasks may find ConEmu to be a more efficient option.

4. **Community Support and Documentation**: ConEmu has a dedicated community of users and extensive documentation available online, providing resources for troubleshooting issues and learning how to maximize the application's capabilities. Hyper Terminal also has a supportive community, but its documentation and online resources may not be as extensive as ConEmu. Developers who value community support and comprehensive documentation may lean towards ConEmu for their terminal emulator needs.

5. **Integration with Plugins and Extensions**: ConEmu offers support for various plugins and extensions that enhance functionality and productivity, allowing users to extend the application's features based on their specific requirements. In comparison, Hyper Terminal has limited support for plugins and extensions, with fewer options available for enhancing the core functionality of the terminal emulator. Developers who rely heavily on third-party integrations and extensions may prefer ConEmu for its extensive plugin support.

6. **Built-in Features and Terminal Capabilities**: ConEmu comes with a range of built-in features such as multiple tabs, split panes, and customizable hotkeys that cater to advanced users who require extensive terminal capabilities for their workflow. Hyper Terminal focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering a streamlined set of features without the complexity of advanced terminal functions. Depending on the specific requirements of a developer's workflow, they may choose ConEmu for its rich feature set or opt for Hyper Terminal for its straightforward design.

## Summary

In summary, ConEmu and Hyper Terminal offer distinct advantages and features that cater to different preferences and requirements of developers. The choice between the two ultimately depends on factors such as operating system compatibility, user interface customization, resource usage, community support, plugin integration, and terminal capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ConEmu
ConEmu
Hyper Terminal
Hyper Terminal

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

smooth window resizing; tabs and splits (panes);
Extensions; Keymaps; Configuration; Cross Platform; Open source; Themes
Statistics
Stacks
30
Stacks
105
Followers
38
Followers
165
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
PowerShell
PowerShell
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to ConEmu, Hyper Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

SecureCRT

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope