StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Cmder vs SecureCRT

Cmder vs SecureCRT

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cmder
Cmder
Stacks45
Followers50
Votes0
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks2.1K
SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0

Cmder vs SecureCRT: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Cmder and SecureCRT

1. **User Interface**: Cmder provides a modern and sleek user interface with features like tabs, split panes, and customizable themes. On the other hand, SecureCRT has a more traditional and professional-looking interface, focusing more on functionality rather than aesthetics.

2. **Supported Platforms**: Cmder is primarily designed for Windows systems and is optimized for use on the Windows command line. SecureCRT, on the other hand, offers cross-platform support and can be used on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux.

3. **Features**: Cmder is a console emulator bundled with numerous pre-configured tools like Git, SSH, and more, making it a convenient all-in-one solution for developers. SecureCRT, on the other hand, is a dedicated SSH and terminal emulator with advanced features like scripting, secure file transfer, and session management.

4. **Customization Options**: Cmder allows users to extensively customize the appearance, behavior, and functionality of the application through settings and themes. SecureCRT also offers customization options but focuses more on configuring connections, sessions, and protocol settings for secure remote access.

5. **License and Pricing**: Cmder is an open-source project released under the MIT License, making it free to use and modify for personal and commercial purposes. SecureCRT, on the other hand, is a commercial software that requires a paid license for extended features and technical support.

6. **Community Support**: Cmder has a large and active community of users and contributors who provide ongoing support, updates, and plugins to enhance the user experience. SecureCRT also has a dedicated support team but relies more on official documentation and resources for assistance.

In Summary, Cmder and SecureCRT differ in terms of user interface, supported platforms, features, customization options, license and pricing, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cmder
Cmder
SecureCRT
SecureCRT

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Total portability; Keyboard shortcuts
Keyword highlighting enhancement; Command Manager (Windows only); Local shell session (Windows); True Color support; Dark Mode support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45
Stacks
4
Followers
50
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Cmder, SecureCRT?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope