Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cmder

44
49
+ 1
0
ConEmu

34
38
+ 1
0
Add tool

Cmder vs ConEmu: What are the differences?

Key differences between Cmder and ConEmu

Cmder and ConEmu are both popular open-source terminal emulators for Windows that offer advanced features and customization options. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Ease of Installation: Cmder is designed to be a standalone package that includes all the necessary components and configurations out of the box. On the other hand, ConEmu requires separate installations of Cygwin or MSYS to provide similar functionality.

  2. User Interface: Cmder has a more modern and visually appealing user interface, with a sleek black console and customizable color schemes. ConEmu, on the other hand, has a more traditional and utilitarian interface, which some users might prefer for its simplicity.

  3. Integration with External Tools: Cmder comes bundled with several useful tools and software, such as Git, PowerShell, and SSH. This integration allows users to easily execute commands and utilize these tools without having to install them separately. ConEmu, on the other hand, does not come with any pre-installed tools and requires users to set up and configure external tools manually.

  4. Customizability: Both Cmder and ConEmu offer extensive customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal environment to their liking. However, Cmder provides a more user-friendly and intuitive configuration interface, making it easier for users to customize and fine-tune their settings.

  5. Developer Support: Cmder is actively maintained and updated by a dedicated team of developers, which ensures a more stable and reliable experience. ConEmu, while still receiving occasional updates, has a smaller developer community and may not have the same level of ongoing support.

  6. Resource Usage: Cmder is known for being lightweight and resource-efficient, making it an ideal choice for users with lower-end systems or limited resources. ConEmu, while still relatively lightweight, might consume slightly more system resources due to its additional features and compatibility with external tools.

In Summary, Cmder and ConEmu differ in terms of their installation process, user interface, integration with external tools, customizability, developer support, and resource usage. Choose Cmder for an easy-to-install, visually appealing, and feature-rich experience, while ConEmu offers a more traditional interface and greater flexibility for experienced users.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More