Cloud 66 vs Heroku

Overview

Heroku

Stacks25.8K

Followers20.5K

Votes3.2K

Cloud 66

Stacks35

Followers38

Votes91

Cloud 66 vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown code provides a comparison between Cloud 66 and Heroku, highlighting the key differences between the two platforms.

Deployment Methods: Cloud 66 allows for the easy deployment of applications across multiple platforms, including bare metal servers, virtual machines, or containers, offering more flexibility for deployment. On the other hand, Heroku focuses solely on hosting applications in containers, specifically designed for deploying and managing containerized applications.
Infrastructure Management: Cloud 66 offers infrastructure management capabilities, enabling users to easily provision and manage infrastructure resources such as servers, networks, and storage. In contrast, Heroku simplifies infrastructure management by abstracting it away, allowing users to focus solely on deploying and managing applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
Scaling Options: Cloud 66 provides various scaling options, such as horizontal scaling by adding more servers or vertical scaling by increasing server resources. These options allow applications to handle increased traffic or workload demands. On the other hand, Heroku offers auto-scaling functionality, automatically adjusting resources based on application metrics, ensuring optimal scalability without manual intervention.
Pricing Model: Cloud 66 operates on a pricing model based on the number of servers and services used, providing more flexibility in selecting and paying for specific resources. On the other hand, Heroku employs a more simplified pricing model, charging based on the resources consumed by the application and the level of support required.
Integration with Version Control Systems: Cloud 66 supports various version control systems such as Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket, allowing for seamless integration and deployment workflows. Heroku also integrates with Git, providing easy deployment directly from a Git repository.
Management Interface: Cloud 66 offers a management interface that provides a comprehensive view of the infrastructure and applications, allowing users to monitor and manage their resources effectively. Heroku offers a user-friendly web-based interface that simplifies application management, making it easy to deploy, scale, and configure applications.

In summary, Cloud 66 offers more deployment options, infrastructure management capabilities, and flexible pricing, while Heroku focuses on containerized application hosting with auto-scaling functionality and a user-friendly interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku	Cloud 66
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.	Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.
Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.	With the convenience of PaaS but on any cloud, and in any region, Cloud 66 has persistent storage, custom network configuration, zero downtime deployments, blue/green and canary releases, full databases support, replication & managed backups. With no team size limits, Cloud 66 offers powerful access management, traffic control, firewalls, SSL certificate management, and more.
Statistics
Stacks 25.8K	Stacks 35
Followers 20.5K	Followers 38
Votes 3.2K	Votes 91
Pros & Cons
Pros 703 Easy deployment 459 Free for side projects 374 Huge time-saver 348 Simple scaling 261 Low devops skills required Cons 27 Super expensive 9 Not a whole lot of flexibility 7 Storage 7 No usable MySQL option 5 Low performance on free tier	Pros 13 Easy provisioning 11 Easy scaling 10 Security 8 Great Support 8 Monitoring
Integrations
Mailgun Postmark Loggly Papertrail Redis Cloud Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Nitrous.IO Logentries MongoLab Gemfury	Honeybadger Linode Rackspace Cloud Servers Weave Google Kubernetes Engine Zube DigitalOcean Logentries Azure Kubernetes Service Google Compute Engine

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Cloud 66?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Cloud 66 vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown code provides a comparison between Cloud 66 and Heroku, highlighting the key differences between the two platforms.

Deployment Methods: Cloud 66 allows for the easy deployment of applications across multiple platforms, including bare metal servers, virtual machines, or containers, offering more flexibility for deployment. On the other hand, Heroku focuses solely on hosting applications in containers, specifically designed for deploying and managing containerized applications.
Infrastructure Management: Cloud 66 offers infrastructure management capabilities, enabling users to easily provision and manage infrastructure resources such as servers, networks, and storage. In contrast, Heroku simplifies infrastructure management by abstracting it away, allowing users to focus solely on deploying and managing applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
Scaling Options: Cloud 66 provides various scaling options, such as horizontal scaling by adding more servers or vertical scaling by increasing server resources. These options allow applications to handle increased traffic or workload demands. On the other hand, Heroku offers auto-scaling functionality, automatically adjusting resources based on application metrics, ensuring optimal scalability without manual intervention.
Pricing Model: Cloud 66 operates on a pricing model based on the number of servers and services used, providing more flexibility in selecting and paying for specific resources. On the other hand, Heroku employs a more simplified pricing model, charging based on the resources consumed by the application and the level of support required.
Integration with Version Control Systems: Cloud 66 supports various version control systems such as Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket, allowing for seamless integration and deployment workflows. Heroku also integrates with Git, providing easy deployment directly from a Git repository.
Management Interface: Cloud 66 offers a management interface that provides a comprehensive view of the infrastructure and applications, allowing users to monitor and manage their resources effectively. Heroku offers a user-friendly web-based interface that simplifies application management, making it easy to deploy, scale, and configure applications.

Cloud 66 vs Heroku

Overview