Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Blade vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Blade and Next.js
Blade and Next.js are both popular frameworks used for web development. While Blade is a templating engine developed for the Laravel PHP framework, Next.js is a React framework used for building server-side rendered and static web applications. Here are the key differences between Blade and Next.js:
1. Templating vs Framework: Blade is primarily a templating engine that allows developers to write HTML code with added functionalities like loops, conditionals, and includes. It is tightly integrated with the Laravel framework. On the other hand, Next.js is a complete framework that offers a wide range of features including server-side rendering, routing, and data fetching.
2. Language and Ecosystem: Blade uses PHP as its programming language, which has a large ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools available. Laravel, the PHP framework that Blade is a part of, provides a robust ecosystem with pre-built functionalities. Next.js, on the other hand, uses JavaScript and the React library, which has a thriving ecosystem with a wide range of npm packages available.
3. Server-side Rendering (SSR): Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, which means that the initial rendering of the web page happens on the server before sending it to the client's browser. This allows for better performance in terms of search engine optimization (SEO) and faster page loading. Blade, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for server-side rendering.
4. Client-side Rendering (CSR) vs Static Site Generation (SSG): With Blade, the rendering of the web page happens on the client-side, as it is part of the Laravel framework, which follows a traditional client-server architecture. Next.js, on the other hand, offers multiple rendering options including client-side rendering (CSR) and static site generation (SSG). This allows developers to choose the best rendering strategy based on their project requirements.
5. Routing and Navigation: Blade relies on the Laravel framework for handling routing and navigation within the application. Laravel provides a powerful routing system with various features like named routes, route groups, and middleware. Next.js, on the other hand, has its own routing system that allows for dynamic routing and nested routing. It also provides built-in support for client-side navigation without page reloading.
6. Deployment and Hosting: Blade applications can be deployed on any web server that supports PHP. Laravel provides tools for easy deployment and popular hosting platforms like shared hosting, VPS, or cloud hosting can be used. Next.js applications, on the other hand, can be deployed as serverless applications on platforms like Vercel or as traditional server-hosted applications on any web server that supports Node.js.
In summary, Blade is a templating engine primarily used for PHP web development within the Laravel framework, while Next.js is a comprehensive React framework that offers server-side rendering, routing, and data fetching capabilities. Next.js provides more flexibility in terms of rendering options, routing, and navigation, while Blade benefits from the extensive PHP ecosystem and easy deployment options.
We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Blade
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Blade
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9