StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs Coverity Scan

Bamboo vs Coverity Scan

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan
Stacks50
Followers185
Votes0

Bamboo vs Coverity Scan: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Bamboo and Coverity Scan

Bamboo is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the build and release process, while Coverity Scan is a static analysis tool that detects issues in the source code by scanning it for security vulnerabilities and defects.

1. Integration vs Static Analysis: Bamboo primarily deals with automating the build and release process, allowing teams to integrate their code frequently and deploy it efficiently. On the other hand, Coverity Scan focuses on static analysis, identifying issues in the codebase without executing the application.

2. Deployment Automation vs Code Analysis: Bamboo emphasizes deployment automation, ensuring a smooth and efficient process of pushing code changes into production. In contrast, Coverity Scan puts more emphasis on code analysis, helping developers identify and rectify security vulnerabilities and defects in the code.

3. Build and Release Management vs Code Quality Improvement: Bamboo is more oriented towards build and release management, providing tools for version control, build automation, and deployment. Coverity Scan, on the other hand, is geared towards improving code quality by detecting issues such as buffer overflows, null pointer dereferences, and other security vulnerabilities.

4. Extensibility and Customization: Bamboo offers a high level of extensibility and customization with add-ons and integrations to tailor the CI/CD pipeline according to project requirements. Coverity Scan, being a specialized static analysis tool, may have limited customization options compared to Bamboo.

5. Real-time Feedback vs In-depth Analysis: Bamboo provides real-time feedback on builds and deployments, allowing developers to identify issues quickly and take immediate action. Coverity Scan offers in-depth analysis of the codebase, providing detailed reports on potential security vulnerabilities and defects that require careful review and resolution.

6. Cost and Licensing: Bamboo requires a license fee for commercial use, while Coverity Scan is available for free as an open-source static analysis tool. This difference in cost and licensing structure may influence the choice between the two tools based on the project budget and requirements.

In Summary, Bamboo and Coverity Scan differ in their focus on deployment automation vs code analysis, build and release management vs code quality improvement, extensibility and customization options, feedback mechanisms, in-depth analysis capabilities, and cost considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
Coverity Scan
Coverity Scan

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.

-
Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
Stacks
504
Stacks
50
Followers
549
Followers
185
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
GitHub
GitHub
Travis CI
Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, Coverity Scan?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana