Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Lambda

23.6K
18.3K
+ 1
432
Zappa

61
99
+ 1
0
Add tool

AWS Lambda vs Zappa: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will explore the key differences between AWS Lambda and Zappa. These are both popular serverless computing platforms that offer different features and capabilities for deploying and running applications. Understanding these differences can help you determine which platform is the best fit for your specific use case.

  1. Pricing and Cost: A significant difference between AWS Lambda and Zappa is their pricing models. AWS Lambda follows a "pay as you go" model, where you are charged based on the number of executions and the duration of each execution. On the other hand, Zappa provides a flat pricing structure, where you pay a fixed monthly fee regardless of the number of executions or duration. This can make Zappa a more cost-effective option for applications with high usage or long-running tasks.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: AWS Lambda offers a seamless integration with other AWS services, allowing you to build complex serverless architectures. It supports event-driven programming and can be triggered by various AWS services such as S3, DynamoDB, and API Gateway. In contrast, Zappa is primarily focused on deploying Python applications to AWS Lambda and does not offer the same level of integration with other AWS services. It provides a simplified deployment process specifically tailored for Python applications.

  3. Configuration and Management: AWS Lambda provides a comprehensive set of configuration options, allowing you to fine-tune your functions based on specific requirements. It supports environment variables, VPC configurations, resource allocation, and concurrency controls. Zappa, on the other hand, simplifies the configuration process by automatically handling many of the underlying settings. While this can be convenient for simple deployments, it may limit customization options for more complex applications.

  4. Monitoring and Logging: AWS Lambda offers built-in monitoring and logging capabilities through AWS CloudWatch. It provides detailed metrics and logs for your functions, allowing you to monitor performance, troubleshoot issues, and set up alerts. Zappa, on the other hand, does not have native monitoring and logging features. However, you can integrate third-party tools like Sentry or Datadog to gather metrics and logs from your Zappa deployments.

  5. Vendor Lock-in: AWS Lambda is a service provided by Amazon Web Services, meaning you are tied to the AWS ecosystem for your serverless computing needs. While AWS offers a wide range of services and resources, this can be limiting if you want to switch to a different cloud provider in the future. Zappa, being an open-source project, provides more flexibility in terms of vendor lock-in. It allows you to deploy to other cloud providers, or even run your serverless applications on your own infrastructure.

  6. Community and Support: AWS Lambda has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums available for developers. It also has official support from Amazon Web Services, ensuring timely bug fixes and updates. Zappa, being an open-source project, also has a vibrant community but may not have the same level of support and documentation as AWS Lambda.

In summary, while AWS Lambda and Zappa are both serverless computing platforms, they differ in terms of pricing models, deployment flexibility, configuration management, monitoring capabilities, vendor lock-in, and community support. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right platform for your specific application needs.

Advice on AWS Lambda and Zappa

Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.

Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic. Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added. Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers. Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.

We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.

Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :) Thanks in advance!

See more
Replies (2)
Anis Zehani

I recommend this : -Spring reactive for back end : the fact it's reactive (async) it consumes half of the resources that a sync platform needs (so less CPU -> less money). -Angular : Web Front end ; it's gives you the possibility to use PWA which is a cheap replacement for a mobile app (but more less popular). -Docker images. -Kubernetes to orchestrate all the containers. -I Use Jenkins / blueocean, ansible for my CI/CD (with Github of course) -AWS of course : u can run a K8S cluster there, make it multi AZ (availability zones) to be highly available, use a load balancer and an auto scaler and ur good to go. -You can store data by taking any managed DB or u can deploy ur own (cheap but risky).

You pay less money, but u need some technical 2 - 3 guys to make that done.

Good luck

See more

My advice will be Front end: React Backend: Language: Java, Kotlin. Database: SQL: Postgres, MySQL, Aurora NOSQL: Mongo db. Caching: Redis. Public : Spring Webflux for async public facing operation. Admin api: Spring boot, Hibrernate, Rest API. Build Container image. Kuberenetes: AWS EKS, AWS ECS, Google GKE. Use Jenkins for CI/CD pipeline. Buddy works is good for AWS. Static content: Host on AWS S3 bucket, Use Cloudfront or Cloudflare as CDN.

Serverless Solution: Api gateway Lambda, Serveless Aurora (SQL). AWS S3 bucket.

See more
Decisions about AWS Lambda and Zappa
Cory Bell

Netlfiy Functions uses AWS Lambda under the hood, but Netlify adds some nice sugar. The biggest advantage is the local development experience with netlify-cli. This allows you to run your functions locally with local configuration or pull configs from the Netlify dashboard. I built a health-check endpoint in about 2 minutes, and my send-email function in less than an hour.

See more
Tim Nolet

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.
The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes β€” way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors β€” still too much complexity
  • Zeit β€” Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk β€” Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX πŸ€“
  • Ops Experience / OX πŸ‚ (?)
  • Cost πŸ’΅
  • Lock in πŸ”

Read the full post linked below for all details

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Lambda
Pros of Zappa
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
  • 12
    AWS Lambda went down taking many sites with it
  • 6
    Event Driven Governance
  • 6
    Extensive API
  • 6
    Auto scale and cost effective
  • 6
    Easy to deploy
  • 5
    VPC Support
  • 3
    Integrated with various AWS services
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of AWS Lambda
    Cons of Zappa
    • 7
      Cant execute ruby or go
    • 3
      Compute time limited
    • 1
      Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is AWS Lambda?

      AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

      What is Zappa?

      Zappa makes it super easy to deploy all Python WSGI applications on AWS Lambda + API Gateway. Think of it as "serverless" web hosting for your Python web apps. That means infinite scaling, zero downtime, zero maintenance - and at a fraction of the cost of your current deployments!

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use AWS Lambda?
      What companies use Zappa?
      See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Lambda or Zappa.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with AWS Lambda?
      What tools integrate with Zappa?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitHubPythonNode.js+47
      54
      72309
      GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
      12
      6566
      JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
      53
      21848
      What are some alternatives to AWS Lambda and Zappa?
      Serverless
      Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
      Azure Functions
      Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
      AWS Step Functions
      AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.
      Google App Engine
      Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
      See all alternatives