StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs AWS CodeStar

AWS CodeBuild vs AWS CodeStar

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43
AWS CodeStar
AWS CodeStar
Stacks24
Followers171
Votes8

AWS CodeBuild vs AWS CodeStar: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodeStar are two services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that offer different functionalities relating to software development. In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between these two services.

  1. Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild operates on a pay-per-use pricing model, where users are billed only for the build time of their projects. On the other hand, AWS CodeStar provides a pricing model that includes the usage of multiple AWS services, such as AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodePipeline, in addition to AWS CodeBuild.

  2. Level of Abstraction: AWS CodeStar is a higher-level service that aims to provide an integrated environment for full-stack development projects. It combines different AWS services and tools into a unified platform, allowing for easier project management. AWS CodeBuild, on the other hand, focuses solely on providing a scalable and fully managed build service, without the additional integrated features of CodeStar.

  3. Project Templates: AWS CodeStar offers a wide range of project templates and pre-configured settings for various programming languages and frameworks. These templates allow developers to quickly set up and deploy their projects with a few clicks. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild does not provide predefined project templates. Users need to define their build settings manually or through scripts.

  4. Customization and Flexibility: With AWS CodeStar, users have limited control over the underlying infrastructure and configuration settings. It is designed to simplify the development process by providing predefined settings and environments. On the other hand, AWS CodeBuild offers more customization options, allowing users to define their build environment, specify build commands, and integrate with other AWS services according to their specific requirements.

  5. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: AWS CodeStar integrates different AWS services, including AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CodeCommit, to provide a complete Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) solution. It offers a streamlined workflow for building, testing, and deploying applications. While AWS CodeBuild can be used as a standalone build service within a CI/CD pipeline, it does not provide the same level of integrated CI/CD features as CodeStar.

  6. Collaboration and Team Management: AWS CodeStar includes features for team collaboration and management, such as role-based access control, collaboration tools, and project dashboards. These features enable multiple developers to work together on a project and streamline the development process. AWS CodeBuild, on the other hand, does not focus on collaboration or team management features. It primarily focuses on the build process itself.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild is a flexible and scalable build service that can be used as a standalone tool within a broader development process. It offers more customization options and control over the build environment. On the other hand, AWS CodeStar is an integrated platform that combines various AWS services for full-stack development projects, providing predefined settings, project templates, and collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeStar
AWS CodeStar

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Start developing on AWS in minutes;Manage software delivery in one place;Work across your team securely;Choose from a variety of project templates
Statistics
Stacks
443
Stacks
24
Followers
485
Followers
171
Votes
43
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Pros
  • 3
    Simple to set up
  • 2
    Manual Steps Available
  • 1
    Flexible
  • 1
    Integrations
  • 1
    GitHub integration
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Jira
Jira

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodeStar?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot