Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs WSO2 Identity Server: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server are both popular identity and access management (IAM) solutions that provide features to secure and manage user identities. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms. This article aims to highlight six specific differences between Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server.
Deployment Models: While Auth0 is a cloud-based IAM solution, WSO2 Identity Server offers both on-premises and cloud deployment options. This difference in deployment models allows organizations to choose the option that best suits their specific requirements and preferences.
Customization and Extensibility: Auth0 offers a highly customizable and extensible platform, allowing developers to tailor the IAM solution to their unique needs. On the other hand, WSO2 Identity Server provides even greater customization and extensibility options, including the ability to add custom components, plugins, and extensions.
Scalability: Both Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server are designed to handle large user bases and high-scale usage. However, WSO2 Identity Server boasts greater scalability, with built-in support for horizontal scaling and distributed deployments, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive and complex IAM requirements.
Standards Support: WSO2 Identity Server has a strong focus on standards-based authentication, authorization, and federation protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect. Auth0 also supports these standards but provides additional proprietary protocols and frameworks, such as Auth0.js, to simplify the integration process.
Developer Experience: Auth0 prides itself on its developer-friendly experience, providing extensive documentation, SDKs, and libraries for various programming languages and frameworks. WSO2 Identity Server also offers comprehensive developer resources, including APIs, SDKs, and sample applications, but may require a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and advanced features.
Pricing Model: Auth0 follows a subscription-based pricing model, wherein users pay based on the number of active users and additional features required. In contrast, WSO2 Identity Server follows an open-source model, where the core functionality is free to use but additional enterprise features may require a paid subscription. This difference in pricing models allows organizations to choose the option that aligns with their budget and specific needs.
In Summary, Auth0 and WSO2 Identity Server differ in their deployment models, customization and extensibility options, scalability, standards support, developer experience, and pricing models.
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token70
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of WSO2 Identity Server
- It's a open source solution1
- Supports multiple identity provider1
- OpenID and SAML support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4
Cons of WSO2 Identity Server
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Auth0?
What is WSO2 Identity Server?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use WSO2 Identity Server?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with WSO2 Identity Server?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17