Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apiman

18
48
+ 1
0
Kong

633
1.5K
+ 1
139
Add tool

Apiman vs Kong: What are the differences?

Introduction Apiman and Kong are both API management platforms that offer similar functionalities. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Deployment Flexibility: Apiman provides more deployment flexibility compared to Kong. Apiman can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, offering more options to organizations with specific deployment requirements. On the other hand, Kong is primarily designed for cloud-native deployments, making it a better fit for organizations that are cloud-centric.

  2. Plugin Extensibility: Kong offers a wide range of plugins, giving users the ability to enhance its functionalities. It provides a rich ecosystem of community-contributed and commercially supported plugins. In contrast, while Apiman also has plugin support, the number and variety of available plugins are comparatively limited. This difference in plugin extensibility can be an important consideration for organizations depending on their specific integration and customization needs.

  3. Enterprise-Grade Features: Apiman is well-known for its extensive set of enterprise-grade features. It offers advanced capabilities such as policy enforcement, security features, rate limiting, and analytics, making it an attractive choice for organizations that require comprehensive API management functionalities. While Kong also provides some enterprise-grade features, it may not have the same level of depth and breadth as Apiman.

  4. Community and Support: Kong has a thriving community and active support channels. It has a large user base and a dedicated team constantly working on improving and expanding the platform. This can be advantageous for organizations that prefer a well-established and widely adopted solution with extensive community support. Although Apiman also has community support and continuous development, it may not enjoy the same level of community engagement and extensive third-party integration as Kong.

  5. Scalability: Both Apiman and Kong are designed to be scalable, but Kong is often considered more scalable due to its architecture. Kong utilizes a highly performant and lightweight Nginx core, making it capable of handling high loads and processing large amounts of API traffic efficiently. While Apiman can scale well too, Kong's architecture and performance optimizations may make it a better choice for organizations that anticipate high API traffic and require exceptional scalability.

  6. Pricing: Lastly, pricing can be a significant differentiator between Apiman and Kong. While specific pricing details may vary based on an organization's requirements and negotiations, generally, Kong follows a commercial model with various subscription plans available. At the same time, Apiman is an open-source platform with no direct licensing costs, making it a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious organizations.

In summary, Apiman offers more deployment flexibility and is a cost-effective choice, while Kong provides stronger plugin extensibility, a vibrant community, and better scalability. Both platforms have enterprise-grade features, but Apiman may excel in depth and breadth, depending on specific requirements.

Decisions about Apiman and Kong
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 294.1K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apiman
Pros of Kong
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 37
      Easy to maintain
    • 32
      Easy to install
    • 26
      Flexible
    • 21
      Great performance
    • 7
      Api blueprint
    • 4
      Custom Plugins
    • 3
      Kubernetes-native
    • 2
      Security
    • 2
      Has a good plugin infrastructure
    • 2
      Agnostic
    • 1
      Load balancing
    • 1
      Documentation is clear
    • 1
      Very customizable

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Apiman?

    It provides an easy way for API/service providers to use a web UI to define service contracts for their APIs, apply these contracts across multiple APIs, and control role-based user access and API versioning.

    What is Kong?

    Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Apiman?
    What companies use Kong?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Apiman or Kong.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Apiman?
    What tools integrate with Kong?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+26
    29
    15989
    What are some alternatives to Apiman and Kong?
    3scale
    3scale's API Management platform provides services and solutions, allowing you to Operate, Manage and Distribute your APIs. Trusted by 450+ API programs.
    WSO2
    It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
    Gravitee.io
    It is a flexible, lightweight and blazing-fast open source API Platform that helps your organization control finely who, when and how users access your APIs.
    Apigee
    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
    Keycloak
    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.
    See all alternatives