StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Stream Processing
  5. AWS Lambda vs Apache Storm

AWS Lambda vs Apache Storm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Storm
Apache Storm
Stacks207
Followers282
Votes25
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks4.1K
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Stacks26.0K
Followers18.8K
Votes432

AWS Lambda vs Apache Storm: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS Lambda and Apache Storm

AWS Lambda and Apache Storm are both popular platforms used for processing and analyzing big data in real-time. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Execution Model: AWS Lambda follows a serverless execution model, where functions are written and deployed to the service without the need to provision or manage servers. On the other hand, Apache Storm follows a distributed execution model, where a cluster of machines is required to run the processing tasks.

  2. Event-Driven vs Stream Processing: AWS Lambda is specifically designed for event-driven computing, where it automatically triggers the execution of a function in response to an event. It works well for processing discrete events and is optimized for low-latency and small-scale operations. Meanwhile, Apache Storm is a stream processing framework that provides a powerful way to process continuous streams of data in real-time. It excels at handling high-velocity, high-volume data streams.

  3. Managed Service vs Framework: AWS Lambda is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services. It allows developers to focus solely on writing the code without worrying about managing infrastructure. On the other hand, Apache Storm is an open-source framework that requires installation, configuration, and management of the underlying infrastructure.

  4. Supported Languages: AWS Lambda supports a wide range of programming languages including Python, Java, Node.js, C#, and Go. It provides flexibility for developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with. In contrast, Apache Storm primarily focuses on Java for writing topologies, although there are some third-party libraries available for other languages.

  5. Scalability: AWS Lambda provides automatic scaling, allowing functions to handle varying workloads without manual intervention. It automatically provisions the required resources based on the incoming requests. Apache Storm also offers scalability, but it requires manual configuration and management of the cluster to handle the load.

  6. Fault-Tolerance: AWS Lambda provides built-in fault tolerance by replicating the function instances across multiple availability zones. If one instance fails, the workload is automatically shifted to another healthy instance. Apache Storm relies on the acknowledgment mechanism to ensure message reliability and handles failures through manual intervention.

In summary, AWS Lambda and Apache Storm differ in their execution models, purpose (event-driven vs stream processing), management approach, language support, scalability, and fault-tolerance mechanisms. Choosing between them depends on specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Storm
Apache Storm
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda

Apache Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm has many use cases: realtime analytics, online machine learning, continuous computation, distributed RPC, ETL, and more. Storm is fast: a benchmark clocked it at over a million tuples processed per second per node. It is scalable, fault-tolerant, guarantees your data will be processed, and is easy to set up and operate.

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Storm integrates with the queueing and database technologies you already use;Simple API;Scalable;Fault tolerant;Guarantees data processing;Use with any language;Easy to deploy and operate;Free and open source
Extend other AWS services with custom logic;Build custom back-end services;Completely Automated Administration;Built-in Fault Tolerance;Automatic Scaling;Integrated Security Model;Bring Your Own Code;Pay Per Use;Flexible Resource Model
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
207
Stacks
26.0K
Followers
282
Followers
18.8K
Votes
25
Votes
432
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Flexible
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Event Processing
  • 3
    Clojure
  • 2
    Real Time
Pros
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
Cons
  • 7
    Cant execute ruby or go
  • 3
    Compute time limited
  • 1
    Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort

What are some alternatives to Apache Storm, AWS Lambda?

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Confluent

Confluent

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase