Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Kylin

58
221
+ 1
23
AWS Glue

421
735
+ 1
9
Add tool

Apache Kylin vs AWS Glue: What are the differences?

Developers describe Apache Kylin as "OLAP Engine for Big Data". Apache Kylin™ is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine designed to provide SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop/Spark supporting extremely large datasets, originally contributed from eBay Inc. On the other hand, AWS Glue is detailed as "Fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service". A fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy for customers to prepare and load their data for analytics.

Apache Kylin and AWS Glue belong to "Big Data Tools" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Apache Kylin are:

  • Extremely Fast OLAP Engine at Scale
  • ANSI SQL Interface on Hadoop
  • Interactive Query Capability

On the other hand, AWS Glue provides the following key features:

  • Easy - AWS Glue automates much of the effort in building, maintaining, and running ETL jobs. AWS Glue crawls your data sources, identifies data formats, and suggests schemas and transformations. AWS Glue automatically generates the code to execute your data transformations and loading processes.
  • Integrated - AWS Glue is integrated across a wide range of AWS services.
  • Serverless - AWS Glue is serverless. There is no infrastructure to provision or manage. AWS Glue handles provisioning, configuration, and scaling of the resources required to run your ETL jobs on a fully managed, scale-out Apache Spark environment. You pay only for the resources used while your jobs are running.

Apache Kylin is an open source tool with 2.23K GitHub stars and 992 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Apache Kylin's open source repository on GitHub.

Advice on Apache Kylin and AWS Glue

We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to

  • keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
  • give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
  • move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments

We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.

See more
Replies (3)
John Nguyen

You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.

But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.

See more
Recommends
AirflowAirflow

Though we have always built something custom, Apache airflow (https://airflow.apache.org/) stood out as a key contender/alternative when it comes to open sources. On the commercial offering, Amazon Redshift combined with Amazon Kinesis (for complex manipulations) is great for BI, though Redshift as such is expensive.

See more
Recommends

You may want to look into a Data Virtualization product called Conduit. It connects to disparate data sources in AWS, on prem, Azure, GCP, and exposes them as a single unified Spark SQL view to PowerBI (direct query) or Tableau. Allows auto query and caching policies to enhance query speeds and experience. Has a GPU query engine and optimized Spark for fallback. Can be deployed on your AWS VM or on prem, scales up and out. Sounds like the ideal solution to your needs.

See more
Vamshi Krishna
Data Engineer at Tata Consultancy Services · | 4 upvotes · 195.7K views

I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?

See more

Hi all,

Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?

See more
Replies (4)

you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster

See more
Carlos Acedo
Data Technologies Manager at SDG Group Iberia · | 5 upvotes · 175.8K views
Recommends
Amazon RedshiftAmazon Redshift

First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.

Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.

I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.

See more
Alexis Blandin
Recommends
Amazon AthenaAmazon Athena

It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift

See more
Recommends

you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache Kylin
Pros of AWS Glue
  • 7
    Star schema and snowflake schema support
  • 5
    Seamless BI integration
  • 4
    OLAP on Hadoop
  • 3
    Sub-second latency on extreme large dataset
  • 2
    Easy install
  • 2
    ANSI-SQL
  • 9
    Managed Hive Metastore

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Apache Kylin?

Apache Kylin™ is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine designed to provide SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop/Spark supporting extremely large datasets, originally contributed from eBay Inc.

What is AWS Glue?

A fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy for customers to prepare and load their data for analytics.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Apache Kylin and AWS Glue as a desired skillset
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
CBRE
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland England Feltham
CBRE
United States of America Texas Richardson
CBRE
Philippines National Capital Region Makati City
What companies use Apache Kylin?
What companies use AWS Glue?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Kylin or AWS Glue.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache Kylin?
What tools integrate with AWS Glue?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Aug 28 2019 at 3:10AM

Segment

PythonJavaAmazon S3+16
7
2377
What are some alternatives to Apache Kylin and AWS Glue?
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
Presto
Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data
Druid
Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.
Apache Impala
Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.
AtScale
Its Virtual Data Warehouse delivers performance, security and agility to exceed the demands of modern-day operational analytics.
See all alternatives