Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Angular 2

+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Angular 2 vs KnockoutJS: What are the differences?

Developers describe Angular 2 as "One framework. Mobile & desktop". Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications. On the other hand, KnockoutJS is detailed as "Knockout makes it easier to create rich, responsive UIs with JavaScript". Knockout is a JavaScript MVVM (a modern variant of MVC) library that makes it easier to create rich, desktop-like user interfaces with JavaScript and HTML. It uses observers to make your UI automatically stay in sync with an underlying data model, along with a powerful and extensible set of declarative bindings to enable productive development.

Angular 2 and KnockoutJS can be primarily classified as "Javascript MVC Frameworks" tools.

Angular 2 and KnockoutJS are both open source tools. Angular 2 with 49.5K GitHub stars and 13.5K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than KnockoutJS with 9.54K GitHub stars and 1.54K GitHub forks.

AgoraPulse, WePay, and Edools are some of the popular companies that use Angular 2, whereas KnockoutJS is used by Runscope, Huddle, and EasyPreOrders. Angular 2 has a broader approval, being mentioned in 259 company stacks & 237 developers stacks; compared to KnockoutJS, which is listed in 27 company stacks and 21 developer stacks.

Decisions about Angular 2 and Knockout
Dennis Ziolkowski
CTO at Prepaid-Hoster · | 3 upvotes · 56K views
Angular 2Angular 2

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

See more
Julius alvarado

It is a complete waste of time and life to learn a different framework to solve the same problem (Both AngularJS and Angular build A+ UI's, but both require a lot of time to learn). It's dumb to spend 200 hours learning AngularJS, then 200 hours learning Angular when you could spend 200 hours learning AngularJS and 200 hours learning how to solve a different problem (like AI/ML, Data Science, AR/VR, Digital Marketing, etc.)

See more
Kyle Harrison
Web Application Developer at Fortinet · | 2 upvotes · 13K views

When deciding on a front end framework to build my bitcoin faucet project, I knew I needed something battle hardened, dependedable, but also feature filled and ready to go out of the box.

While I've written some smaller apps with ng2+, I've never gone full tilt with it so I knew there were still some things to learn, and most importantly: how to do them properly, such as proper component architecture and breaking old habbits from ng1.

I didn't opt for React in this case, simply due to the need to stack more and more things on top of it to do what I'd need it to do. I wanted a framework that was going to take over routing and execution of complex UI controls, and keep items outside of a component's scope updated and react to events. This framework needed a comprehensive event emission system, data acquisition and handling, bi-directional data binding, state, and a series of things that you'd need to install separately for React to match up to what's already in the box with Angular.

I opted to stick to Angular instead of Vue for the fact that Angular also already has it's entire build system ready to go and comprehensivly built to deliver the tiniest version of it's deliverable. I was hosting this thing in a google cloud instance, so I needed to make sure the app stayed as small as possible, and could automatically trim out the cruft. This is where Angular's built in Tree Shaking took precedence for me.

Vue is more than capable of handling everything I'd need, and it was something I took serious considerion of. For instance, Vue poweres Cointiply, another bitcoin faucet application that's highly reactive and high componentized just like I wanted.

But I'd still need to learn Vue, I'd still need to configure it's build system, and I still wanted to use SCSS and TypeScript.

So Angular it was. ng8 is a great platform for building very complex user interfaces, and has many of the problems you'd inevitably face integrating a user interface to an application already figured out, and complete with a best practice recommendation.

React and Vue, given enough time and energy, are super capable platforms. No one can deny that. Angular's "A-Z Batteries Included" approach to the whole development process is what made it especially enticing this time.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Angular 2
Pros of Knockout
  • 96
    It's a powerful framework
  • 47
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 40
  • 39
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 37
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
  • 35
    Amazing CLI
  • 30
    Great mvc
  • 22
    Powerfull Dependency Injection
  • 18
    Easy to build
  • 13
    Opinionated, batteries-included approach
  • 10
    All in one Framework
  • 7
  • 7
    Solid Standard Setup.
  • 6
  • 5
  • 3
    Only for single page applications
  • 3
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2
    Data centered application
  • 2
    Great for validations
  • 1
    Open source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Angular 2
Cons of Knockout
  • 9
  • 9
    Large overhead in file size and initialization time
  • 2
    Ugly code
  • 2
  • 2
    CLI not open to other test and linting tools
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Angular 2?

    It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

    What is Knockout?

    It is a JavaScript library that helps you to create rich, responsive display and editor user interfaces with a clean underlying data model. Any time you have sections of UI that update dynamically (e.g., changing depending on the user’s actions or when an external data source changes), it can help you implement it more simply and maintainably.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Angular 2?
    What companies use Knockout?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Angular 2 or Knockout.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Angular 2?
    What tools integrate with Knockout?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Angular 2 and Knockout?
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.
    Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.
    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
    A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.
    See all alternatives