Ampersand.js聽vs聽Angular 2

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ampersand.js

16
21
+ 1
31
Angular 2

4.4K
3.4K
+ 1
413
Add tool

Ampersand.js vs Angular 2: What are the differences?

Developers describe Ampersand.js as "A highly modular, loosely coupled, non-frameworky framework for building advanced JavaScript apps". We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It鈥檚 brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules. On the other hand, Angular 2 is detailed as "One framework. Mobile & desktop". Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Ampersand.js and Angular 2 belong to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider Ampersand.js over the competitors, whereas "It's a powerful framework" was stated as the key factor in picking Angular 2.

Ampersand.js and Angular 2 are both open source tools. It seems that Angular 2 with 49.5K GitHub stars and 13.5K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Ampersand.js with 818 GitHub stars and 52 GitHub forks.

Decisions about Ampersand.js and Angular 2
Dennis Ziolkowski
Migrated
from
AngularJS
to
Angular 2

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

See more
Julius alvarado

It is a complete waste of time and life to learn a different framework to solve the same problem (Both AngularJS and Angular build A+ UI's, but both require a lot of time to learn). It's dumb to spend 200 hours learning AngularJS, then 200 hours learning Angular when you could spend 200 hours learning AngularJS and 200 hours learning how to solve a different problem (like AI/ML, Data Science, AR/VR, Digital Marketing, etc.)

See more
Kyle Harrison
Web Application Developer at Fortinet | 2 upvotes 路 4.6K views

When deciding on a front end framework to build my bitcoin faucet project, I knew I needed something battle hardened, dependedable, but also feature filled and ready to go out of the box.

While I've written some smaller apps with ng2+, I've never gone full tilt with it so I knew there were still some things to learn, and most importantly: how to do them properly, such as proper component architecture and breaking old habbits from ng1.

I didn't opt for React in this case, simply due to the need to stack more and more things on top of it to do what I'd need it to do. I wanted a framework that was going to take over routing and execution of complex UI controls, and keep items outside of a component's scope updated and react to events. This framework needed a comprehensive event emission system, data acquisition and handling, bi-directional data binding, state, and a series of things that you'd need to install separately for React to match up to what's already in the box with Angular.

I opted to stick to Angular instead of Vue for the fact that Angular also already has it's entire build system ready to go and comprehensivly built to deliver the tiniest version of it's deliverable. I was hosting this thing in a google cloud instance, so I needed to make sure the app stayed as small as possible, and could automatically trim out the cruft. This is where Angular's built in Tree Shaking took precedence for me.

Vue is more than capable of handling everything I'd need, and it was something I took serious considerion of. For instance, Vue poweres Cointiply, another bitcoin faucet application that's highly reactive and high componentized just like I wanted.

But I'd still need to learn Vue, I'd still need to configure it's build system, and I still wanted to use SCSS and TypeScript.

So Angular it was. ng8 is a great platform for building very complex user interfaces, and has many of the problems you'd inevitably face integrating a user interface to an application already figured out, and complete with a best practice recommendation.

React and Vue, given enough time and energy, are super capable platforms. No one can deny that. Angular's "A-Z Batteries Included" approach to the whole development process is what made it especially enticing this time.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Ampersand.js
Pros of Angular 2
  • 5
    Open source
  • 4
    Micromodules
  • 3
    CommonJS
  • 3
    npm
  • 3
    Loosely Coupled
  • 2
    non-frameworky
  • 2
    Integrates well with anything
  • 2
    Great Community
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Simple
  • 1
    JavaScript
  • 93
    It's a powerful framework
  • 47
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 39
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 38
    TypeScript
  • 37
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
  • 33
    Amazing CLI
  • 30
    Great mvc
  • 22
    Powerfull Dependency Injection
  • 17
    Easy to build
  • 13
    Opinionated, batteries-included approach
  • 9
    All in one Framework
  • 7
    Solid Standard Setup.
  • 7
    Schematics
  • 6
    Structured
  • 5
    Performance
  • 3
    Only for single page applications
  • 3
    Complex
  • 1
    Builders
  • 0
    React

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ampersand.js
Cons of Angular 2
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 8
      Large overhead in file size and initialization time
    • 8
      Overcomplicated
    • 2
      Ugly code
    • 2
      Cringe
    • 2
      CLI not open to other test and linting tools

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Ampersand.js?

    We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It鈥檚 brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

    What is Angular 2?

    It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Ampersand.js?
    What companies use Angular 2?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Ampersand.js or Angular 2.
    Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Ampersand.js?
    What tools integrate with Angular 2?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      +12
      5
      3253
      What are some alternatives to Ampersand.js and Angular 2?
      AngularJS
      AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML鈥檚 syntax to express your application鈥檚 components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
      Vue.js
      It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
      Backbone.js
      Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.
      Ember.js
      A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
      Aurelia
      Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.
      See all alternatives
      How developers use Ampersand.js and Angular 2
      CloudRepo uses
      Angular 2

      The Angular 2 CLI is great, it's easy to get up and running with a project.

      The really great thing about Angular 2 is it allows us to work with designers by augmenting their artifacts (html pages) with Angular directives. This allows our designs to go back and forth between designers and engineers without having to learn a new markup language (like JSX).

      Andrew Miller uses
      Angular 2

      Angular 2 is a great framework for C# developers. Deeply rooted in OOP & MVC principles and full integration with TypeScript. My go-to for client-side dev now...

      Pascal Malbranche uses
      Angular 2

      Angular 2 is a beautiful and fast MVC Framework. We are using it for mobile, web and desktop development.

      Daniel Kovacs uses
      Angular 2

      Webapp frontend development in enterprise projects.

      Harba uses
      Angular 2

      Frontend for administrative dashboard.