StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Dns Management
  5. Amazon Route 53 vs Netlify

Amazon Route 53 vs Netlify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Stacks14.5K
Followers9.4K
Votes678
Netlify
Netlify
Stacks3.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes207

Amazon Route 53 vs Netlify: What are the differences?

Introduction: Amazon Route 53 and Netlify are both widely used services for managing DNS (Domain Name System) and web hosting. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences in terms of functionality and features. Below are the main differences between Amazon Route 53 and Netlify.

  1. Pricing models: Amazon Route 53 follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of DNS queries and hosted zones. On the other hand, Netlify offers fixed pricing plans based on the number of team members and usage requirements. This difference in pricing models allows users to choose the option that best suits their budget and needs.

  2. Infrastructure scale: Amazon Route 53 is part of Amazon Web Services (AWS), which is known for its massive scale and infrastructure capabilities. It offers a high level of reliability and global coverage with its extensive network of DNS servers. Netlify, although it provides reliable and scalable hosting, operates on a smaller scale compared to AWS. This difference in infrastructure scale can impact the performance and availability of websites hosted on these platforms.

  3. Integration with other AWS services: One of the major advantages of using Amazon Route 53 is its seamless integration with the wide range of AWS services. It can easily integrate with services like EC2, Elastic Load Balancing, and S3, allowing users to create advanced and highly resilient infrastructure setups. Netlify, on the other hand, is primarily focused on static website hosting and may not provide the same level of integration with other AWS services.

  4. Deployment and continuous integration: Netlify offers built-in deployment and continuous integration capabilities, making it easy for developers to streamline their development workflows. It automatically builds and deploys websites based on code changes pushed to a selected repository, providing a seamless experience for developers. While Amazon Route 53 can also be used to host static websites, it may require additional setup and configuration for deployment and continuous integration.

  5. Built-in CDN (Content Delivery Network): Amazon Route 53 provides users with the option to enable its CloudFront CDN for their hosted websites. This allows for better performance and faster loading times, especially for users accessing the website from different geographic locations. Netlify, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in CDN and users would need to rely on third-party CDN services for better global content delivery.

  6. Custom domain support: Both Amazon Route 53 and Netlify support custom domains, allowing users to use their own domain names for their websites. However, Amazon Route 53 offers more flexibility and advanced DNS management features, such as DNS routing policies and health checks, to optimize traffic routing and ensure high availability. Netlify simplifies the process of adding custom domains but may not offer the same level of DNS management options as Amazon Route 53.

In summary, Amazon Route 53 and Netlify have key differences in pricing models, infrastructure scale, integration with other AWS services, deployment capabilities, built-in CDN support, and custom domain management. Users can choose the option that aligns with their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Route 53, Netlify

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments
Eric
Eric

Service Engineer at Zix Corporation

Aug 5, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon Route 53Amazon Route 53

We are looking for advice / best-practices / caveats about migrating off BIND on to Unbound https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ for internal & external (customer-facing) DNS. Is unbound suitable for this, or is it only recommended for caching? How easy or difficult is it to move 10000's of existing BIND DNS zone entries? We already use Amazon Route 53 for our AWS instances and Cloud DNS for our GCP ones, but would like to maintain internal DNS for cost, control, and latency reasons.

58.6k views58.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Route 53
Amazon Route 53
Netlify
Netlify

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Highly Available and Reliable – Route 53 is built using AWS’s highly available and reliable infrastructure. The distributed nature of our DNS servers helps ensure a consistent ability to route your end users to your application. Route 53 is designed to provide the level of dependability required by important applications. Amazon Route 53 is backed by the Amazon Route 53 Service Level Agreement.;Scalable – Route 53 is designed to automatically scale to handle very large query volumes without any intervention from you.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services – Route 53 is designed to work well with other AWS features and offerings. You can use Route 53 to map domain names to your Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon S3 buckets, Amazon CloudFront distributions, and other AWS resources. By using the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) service with Route 53, you get fine grained control over who can update your DNS data. You can use Route 53 to map your zone apex (example.com versus www.example.com) to your Elastic Load Balancing instance or Amazon S3 website bucket using a feature called Alias record.;Simple – With self-service sign-up, Route 53 can start to answer your DNS queries within minutes. You can configure your DNS settings with the AWS Management Console or our easy-to-use API. You can also programmatically integrate the Route 53 API into your overall web application. For instance, you can use Route 53’s API to create a new DNS record whenever you create a new EC2 instance.;Fast – Using a global anycast network of DNS servers around the world, Route 53 is designed to automatically route your users to the optimal location depending on network conditions. As a result, the service offers low query latency for your end users, as well as low update latency for your DNS record management needs.;Cost-Effective – Route 53 passes on the benefits of AWS’s scale to you. You pay only for managing domains through the service and the number of queries that the service answers for each of your domains, at a low cost and without minimum usage commitments or any up-front fees.;Secure – By integrating Route 53 with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), you can grant unique credentials and manage permissions for every user within your AWS account and specify who has access to which parts of the Route 53 service.;Flexible – Route 53 offers Weighted Round-Robin (WRR), also known as DNS load balancing. This lets you assign weights to your DNS records that specify what portion of your traffic is routed to various endpoints.
Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
3.6K
Followers
9.4K
Followers
2.1K
Votes
678
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 185
    High-availability
  • 148
    Simple
  • 103
    Backed by amazon
  • 76
    Fast
  • 54
    Auhtoritive dns servers are spread over different tlds
Cons
  • 2
    Geo-based routing only works with AWS zones
  • 2
    SLOW
  • 1
    Restrictive rate limit
Pros
  • 48
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 23
    Super simple deploys
  • 23
    Free SSL support
  • 16
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
Cons
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Amazon Route 53, Netlify?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

DNSimple

DNSimple

DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate!

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Google Cloud DNS

Google Cloud DNS

Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Dyn

Dyn

An all-in-one Managed DNS service for your registered domain names. Dyn DNS is the perfect solution for your domain name’s DNS needs, whether it is for personal or business use. It gives you complete control over your DNS zone and its associated DNS records, complete with a simple DNS management web interface.

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope