Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon RDS vs Apache Spark: What are the differences?
Scalability: Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service that provides different engine options like MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, etc. It offers automatic scaling capabilities to handle a growing workload efficiently. On the other hand, Apache Spark is a distributed data processing engine that is designed for big data workloads. It can scale horizontally by adding more worker nodes to the cluster, allowing it to handle large amounts of data and perform computations in parallel.
Data Processing Paradigm: Amazon RDS follows a traditional relational database model with support for SQL queries and transactions. It is optimized for OLTP workloads and ensures ACID compliance. In contrast, Apache Spark is built around the concept of Resilient Distributed Datasets (RDDs) and supports various data processing paradigms like batch processing, interactive querying, streaming, and machine learning. It enables complex data transformations and analytics operations on distributed datasets.
Managed Service vs. Framework: Amazon RDS is a fully managed service provided by AWS, where users can focus on application development without worrying about database administration tasks like backups, patching, and scaling. On the contrary, Apache Spark is an open-source distributed computing framework that users need to deploy and manage on their own infrastructure or cloud environment. Although cloud providers like Databricks offer managed Apache Spark services, users still have more control and flexibility compared to a fully managed database service like Amazon RDS.
Data Storage: Amazon RDS stores data in a structured format using a relational database management system, which enforces a schema and ensures data integrity through constraints and relationships. In contrast, Apache Spark supports various data sources, including structured and semi-structured data, and can work with both relational and non-relational data formats. It provides more flexibility in how data is stored, processed, and analyzed.
Real-time Processing: Amazon RDS is optimized for transactional workloads that require consistent and reliable data processing capabilities. While it supports some real-time features like read replicas for scalable read operations, it is not designed for real-time data processing or stream processing tasks. On the other hand, Apache Spark's streaming capabilities allow for real-time data processing and analysis, making it suitable for use cases that require low-latency insights from continuously streaming data sources.
Use Cases: Amazon RDS is well-suited for traditional OLTP applications, reporting, and analytics workloads that require a relational database with ACID compliance. It is a good fit for applications that demand high availability, durability, and consistent performance for structured data. Apache Spark, on the other hand, is ideal for big data processing tasks such as ETL (Extract, Transform, Load), data warehousing, data exploration, real-time analytics, and machine learning. It excels in handling large-scale data processing and analysis requirements where speed and scalability are essential.
In Summary, When choosing between Amazon RDS and Apache Spark, consider factors like data processing paradigm, scalability, managed service vs. framework, data storage requirements, real-time processing needs, and specific use cases to select the most suitable solution for your application.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
Pros of Amazon RDS
- Reliable failovers165
- Automated backups156
- Backed by amazon130
- Db snapshots92
- Multi-availability87
- Control iops, fast restore to point of time30
- Security28
- Elastic24
- Push-button scaling20
- Automatic software patching20
- Replication4
- Reliable3
- Isolation2
Pros of Apache Spark
- Open-source61
- Fast and Flexible48
- One platform for every big data problem8
- Great for distributed SQL like applications8
- Easy to install and to use6
- Works well for most Datascience usecases3
- Interactive Query2
- Machine learning libratimery, Streaming in real2
- In memory Computation2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon RDS
Cons of Apache Spark
- Speed4