Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Cloud9 IDE: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Cloud9 IDE are both services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that offer different functionalities. However, they have several key differences that set them apart.
ECS Deployment and Orchestration: Amazon ECS is a highly scalable container management service that allows users to easily run and manage applications on clusters of Amazon EC2 instances. It provides a way to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications using Docker containers. On the other hand, Cloud9 IDE is a cloud-based integrated development environment that provides a complete development environment in the cloud. It offers features like code editing, debugging, and collaboration tools, but does not focus on container deployment and orchestration like ECS.
Resource Management: ECS offers advanced resource management features like task placement strategies, services auto-scaling, and integration with AWS services like Elastic Load Balancing, Amazon VPC, and Amazon CloudWatch. It also supports multiple container instances, allowing users to run multiple containers on the same instance. In contrast, Cloud9 IDE focuses on providing a development environment and does not offer these advanced resource management capabilities.
Collaboration and Teamwork: Cloud9 IDE is specifically designed to facilitate collaboration and teamwork among developers. It allows multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously, providing features like real-time collaboration, shared coding sessions, and integrated chat. ECS, on the other hand, is primarily focused on container deployment and management and does not provide these collaboration features.
Pricing Structure: The pricing structure for ECS and Cloud9 IDE differs. ECS pricing is based on the number and type of EC2 instances used, as well as other factors like data transfer and storage. Cloud9 IDE pricing is based on factors like the number of active users, the amount of code storage, and the compute resources used. It is important to consider the specific requirements and usage patterns of your application to determine the most cost-effective option.
Availability and Scalability: ECS is designed to be highly available and scalable, with features like automatic container recovery, fault tolerance, and integration with AWS services for load balancing and scaling. It allows users to easily scale their applications horizontally by adding or removing EC2 instances from the cluster. Cloud9 IDE also offers scalability, but it is focused on providing a scalable development environment rather than application scalability.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Cloud9 IDE is designed to be easy to use and has a shorter learning curve compared to ECS. It provides a familiar and accessible web-based interface that allows developers to start coding immediately without the need for complex setup or configuration. ECS, on the other hand, requires some knowledge of containerization and AWS services to effectively use and manage containerized applications.
In summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is primarily focused on container deployment, management, and scalability, while Cloud9 IDE offers a cloud-based integrated development environment with collaboration features. ECS provides advanced resource management capabilities, while Cloud9 IDE prioritizes ease of use and collaboration. The pricing structures for ECS and Cloud9 IDE differ, and both services offer scalability but in different contexts.
If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes. EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.
Pros of Amazon EC2 Container Service
- Backed by amazon100
- Familiar to ec272
- Cluster based53
- Simple API42
- Iam roles26
- Scheduler7
- Cluster management7
- Programmatic Control7
- Container-enabled applications4
- Socker support4
- No additional cost2
- Easy to use and cheap1
Pros of AWS Cloud9
- Easy to use108
- Free102
- Nice UI76
- Terminal access to vm instead of simulation65
- New full ubuntu machines58
- Easy dev environment49
- Ssh access to your own machine44
- Real-time with other people43
- Free prototype hosting43
- Collaboration32
- Open Source10
- Great syntax highlighting6
- Works great5
- Nice ide4
- Better IDE than the others4
- Extremely easy setup4
- Great interface, download or upload file is nice.4
- Its easy to share code3
- You can run your project easier3
- Open-source friendly3
- Good documentation2
- Bitbucket integration1
- Versatile and robust1
- Need a credit card to get access1
- Starts a VM1
- Easy to use, seem fast, friendly ui1
- Good0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon EC2 Container Service
Cons of AWS Cloud9
- Not free6