StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon EBS vs OpenEBS

Amazon EBS vs OpenEBS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
Stacks650
Followers542
Votes82
OpenEBS
OpenEBS
Stacks28
Followers87
Votes40
GitHub Stars9.5K
Forks972

Amazon EBS vs OpenEBS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and OpenEBS. Both of these solutions are used for providing block storage in the cloud, but they differ in several aspects.

  1. Scalability: Amazon EBS is designed to scale vertically, allowing users to increase the capacity or performance of their storage volumes as per their requirements. On the other hand, OpenEBS is designed to scale horizontally, enabling users to add more storage nodes to increase capacity and performance.

  2. Storage Provisioning: With Amazon EBS, users can create and manage their storage volumes directly in the cloud, without needing to worry about the underlying infrastructure. OpenEBS, on the other hand, is a self-managed solution where users have to provision and manage their own storage nodes and volumes.

  3. Data Replication: Amazon EBS provides built-in data replication mechanisms, such as snapshots and multi-Availability Zone (AZ) replication, to ensure high availability and data durability. OpenEBS relies on container-native storage replication mechanisms, which may require additional configuration and management from the user's side.

  4. Integration with Kubernetes: OpenEBS is specifically designed to integrate with Kubernetes and provides seamless storage provisioning and management within Kubernetes clusters. Amazon EBS, although it can be used with Kubernetes, does not have the same level of native integration and may require additional setup and configuration.

  5. Data Placement: Amazon EBS uses a distributed storage architecture where the data is spread across multiple servers to ensure redundancy and high availability. OpenEBS, on the other hand, allows users to define their own data placement policies, enabling them to control where their data is stored and replicated.

  6. Performance: Amazon EBS offers high-performance block storage optimized for various workloads, such as general-purpose, throughput-optimized, and low-latency. OpenEBS provides flexibility in choosing the desired performance characteristics by allowing users to configure different storage engines and parameters based on their specific requirements.

In summary, Amazon EBS focuses on providing a scalable, managed block storage solution in the cloud with built-in data replication mechanisms, while OpenEBS offers a self-managed, Kubernetes-native storage solution with flexible data placement and performance optimization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
OpenEBS
OpenEBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Amazon EBS allows you to create storage volumes from 1 GB to 1 TB that can be mounted as devices by Amazon EC2 instances. Multiple volumes can be mounted to the same instance.;Amazon EBS enables you to provision a specific level of I/O performance if desired, by choosing a Provisioned IOPS volume. This allows you to predictably scale to thousands of IOPS per Amazon EC2 instance.;Storage volumes behave like raw, unformatted block devices, with user supplied device names and a block device interface. You can create a file system on top of Amazon EBS volumes, or use them in any other way you would use a block device (like a hard drive).;Amazon EBS volumes are placed in a specific Availability Zone, and can then be attached to instances also in that same Availability Zone.;Each storage volume is automatically replicated within the same Availability Zone. This prevents data loss due to failure of any single hardware component.;Amazon EBS also provides the ability to create point-in-time snapshots of volumes, which are persisted to Amazon S3. These snapshots can be used as the starting point for new Amazon EBS volumes, and protect data for long-term durability. The same snapshot can be used to instantiate as many volumes as you wish. These snapshots can be copied across AWS regions, making it easier to leverage multiple AWS regions for geographical expansion, data center migration and disaster recovery.;AWS also enables you to create new volumes from AWS hosted public data sets.;Amazon CloudWatch exposes performance metrics for EBS volumes, giving you insight into bandwidth, throughput, latency, and queue depth. The metrics are accessible via the AWS CloudWatch API or the AWS Management Console. For more details, see Amazon CloudWatch.
Open source; Block Storage; dynamic and static PV/PVC provisioning; CSI Support; raw block devices; snapshots; clones; thin-provisioning; volume grow; volume shrink; multiple file system choices; DR with S3 backup and restore; data persistency across nodes; synchronization of data across cloud availability zones; supported stacks includes OpenShift; Rancher; IBM Cloud Private; Kontena; Kublr; Giant Swarm; Loodse; Docker; Kubernetes; AWS; Azure; Google Cloud; Digital Ocean
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
972
Stacks
650
Stacks
28
Followers
542
Followers
87
Votes
82
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Point-in-time snapshots
  • 27
    Data reliability
  • 19
    Configurable i/o performance
Pros
  • 7
    Great support on Slack
  • 6
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    In user space
  • 5
    Container attached storage
Integrations
No integrations available
Grafana
Grafana
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Prometheus
Prometheus
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Rancher
Rancher
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Helm
Helm
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service

What are some alternatives to Amazon EBS, OpenEBS?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase