Alternatives to SiteCake logo

Alternatives to SiteCake

Grav, WordPress, Drupal, Joomla!, and Adobe Experience Manager are the most popular alternatives and competitors to SiteCake.
2
26
+ 1
7

What is SiteCake and what are its top alternatives?

Sitecake is an easy to use CMS (Content Managament System) for small websites, with a WYSIWYG, drag&drop editor. A standard web hosting packet (a web server and PHP 5.4+) is all you need to install and use it.
SiteCake is a tool in the Self-Hosted Blogging / CMS category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to SiteCake

  • Grav
    Grav

    It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Drupal
    Drupal

    Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world. ...

  • Joomla!
    Joomla!

    Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it. ...

  • Adobe Experience Manager
    Adobe Experience Manager

    It is a Web Content Management System that allows companies to manage their web content (Web pages, digital assets, forms, etc) and also create digital experiences with this content on any platform web, mobile or IoT. ...

  • Strapi
    Strapi

    Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools. ...

  • Netlify CMS
    Netlify CMS

    It is built as a single-page React app. You can create custom-styled previews, UI widgets, and editor plugins or add backends to support different Git platform APIs. ...

  • Ghost
    Ghost

    Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do. ...

SiteCake alternatives & related posts

Grav logo

Grav

108
151
16
A modern open source flat-file CMS
108
151
+ 1
16
PROS OF GRAV
  • 4
    Easy to Update
  • 3
    No Databases
  • 2
    Fast Performance
  • 2
    Extensive Plugins
  • 2
    Strong Security
  • 2
    Full Control over customisation + functionality
  • 1
    Ligth storage use
CONS OF GRAV
  • 2
    Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)

related Grav posts

WordPress logo

WordPress

96K
38.5K
2.1K
A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
96K
38.5K
+ 1
2.1K
PROS OF WORDPRESS
  • 415
    Customizable
  • 366
    Easy to manage
  • 354
    Plugins & themes
  • 258
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
  • 247
    Really powerful
  • 145
    Rapid website development
  • 78
    Best documentation
  • 51
    Codex
  • 44
    Product feature set
  • 35
    Custom/internal social network
  • 18
    Open source
  • 8
    Great for all types of websites
  • 7
    Huge install and user base
  • 5
    Perfect example of user collaboration
  • 5
    Open Source Community
  • 5
    Most websites make use of it
  • 5
    It's simple and easy to use by any novice
  • 5
    Best
  • 5
    I like it like I like a kick in the groin
  • 4
    Community
  • 4
    API-based CMS
  • 3
    Easy To use
  • 2
    <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
CONS OF WORDPRESS
  • 13
    Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
  • 13
    Plugins are of mixed quality
  • 10
    Not best backend UI
  • 2
    Complex Organization
  • 1
    Do not cover all the basics in the core
  • 1
    Great Security

related WordPress posts

Dale Ross
Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.5M views

I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

See more
Siddhant Sharma
Tech Connoisseur at Channelize.io · | 12 upvotes · 1.1M views

WordPress Magento PHP Java Swift JavaScript

Back in the days, we started looking for a date on different matrimonial websites as there were no Dating Applications. We used to create different profiles. It all changed in 2012 when Tinder, an Online Dating application came into India Market.

Tinder allowed us to communicate with our potential soul mates. That too without paying any extra money. I too got 4-6 matches in 6 years. It changed the life of many Millennials. Tinder created a revolution of its own. P.S. - I still don't have a date :(

Posting my first article. Please have a look and do give feedback.

Communication InAppChat Dating Matrimonial #messaging

See more
Drupal logo

Drupal

10.8K
3.8K
359
Free, Open, Modular CMS written in PHP
10.8K
3.8K
+ 1
359
PROS OF DRUPAL
  • 75
    Stable, highly functional cms
  • 60
    Great community
  • 44
    Easy cms to make websites
  • 43
    Highly customizable
  • 22
    Digital customer experience delivery platform
  • 17
    Really powerful
  • 16
    Customizable
  • 11
    Flexible
  • 10
    Good tool for prototyping
  • 9
    Enterprise proven over many years when others failed
  • 8
    Headless adds even more power/flexibility
  • 8
    Open source
  • 7
    Each version becomes more intuitive for clients to use
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 6
    Lego blocks methodology
  • 4
    Caching and performance
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 3
    Built on Symfony
  • 3
    Can build anything
  • 2
    Views
  • 1
    API-based CMS
CONS OF DRUPAL
  • 1
    Steep learning curve
  • 1
    DJango

related Drupal posts

Hi, I am working as a web developer (PHP, Laravel, AngularJS, and MySQL) with more than 8 years of experience and looking for a tech stack that pays better. I have a little bit of knowledge of Core Java. For better opportunities, Should I learn Java, Spring Boot or Python. Or should I learn Drupal, WordPress or Magento? Any guidance would be really appreciated! Thanks.

See more
Jan Vlnas
Developer Advocate at Superface · | 4 upvotes · 43.6K views

Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

See more
Joomla! logo

Joomla!

1.5K
335
37
A content management system helping both novice users and expert developers to create powerful websites and applications
1.5K
335
+ 1
37
PROS OF JOOMLA!
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Vast repository of free and paid extensions
  • 2
    Extensions & Templates
  • 1
    Multilingual in the core
CONS OF JOOMLA!
  • 1
    Depleting dev community

related Joomla! posts

Adobe Experience Manager logo

Adobe Experience Manager

904
207
0
A comprehensive content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms
904
207
+ 1
0
PROS OF ADOBE EXPERIENCE MANAGER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF ADOBE EXPERIENCE MANAGER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Adobe Experience Manager posts

      Hi Everyone, We are looking at creating a reseller website for a customer. Do you have any recommendations on whether we should use WordPress vs Adobe Experience Manager? Our primary considerations are ease of use and a quick development time. And of course, the licensing cost.

      See more
      Strapi logo

      Strapi

      674
      1.3K
      277
      The leading open-source Headless-CMS
      674
      1.3K
      + 1
      277
      PROS OF STRAPI
      • 58
        Free
      • 39
        Open source
      • 28
        Self-hostable
      • 27
        Rapid development
      • 25
        API-based cms
      • 21
        Headless
      • 18
        Real-time
      • 16
        Easy setup
      • 13
        Large community
      • 13
        JSON
      • 6
        GraphQL
      • 4
        Internationalization
      • 4
        Social Auth
      • 2
        Media Library
      • 2
        Components
      • 1
        Raspberry pi
      CONS OF STRAPI
      • 9
        Can be limiting
      • 8
        Internationalisation
      • 6
        A bit buggy
      • 5
        DB Migrations not seemless

      related Strapi posts

      Hi Stackers, We are planning to build a product information portal that also provides useful articles and blogs. Application Frontend is going to be built on Next.js with Authentication and Product Database helped by Firebase. But for the Blog / Article we are debating between WordPress/GraphQL plug-in or Strapi.

      Please share your thoughts.

      See more

      Hi, I went through a comprehensive analysis - of headless/api content management systems - essentially to store content "bits" and publish them where needed (website, 3rd party sites, social media, etc.). I had considered many other solutions but ultimately chose Directus. I believe that was a good choice.

      I had strongly considered Contentful, Strapi, Sanity, and hygraph. Hygraph came in #2 and contentful #3.

      Ultimately I liked directus for:

      (1) time in business

      (2) open source

      (3) integration with n8n and Pipedream

      (4) pricing

      (5) extensibility

      Thoughts? Was this a good choice? We have many WordPress sites we're not (at least now) looking to replace with Directus, but instead to push to.

      I'd love some feedback.

      See more
      Netlify CMS logo

      Netlify CMS

      513
      557
      6
      Open source content management for your Git workflow
      513
      557
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF NETLIFY CMS
      • 3
        Open source
      • 2
        Free
      • 1
        GraphQL API
      CONS OF NETLIFY CMS
      • 2
        No relations between items

      related Netlify CMS posts

      Hanna Rosenfeld

      Hi,

      for my last project, my client wanted a CMS to edit basically the entire webpage. I used Netlify CMS for this, but I ran into a lot of issues. I am not sure if CMSs are just hard in general.

      What matters to me is pricing (ideally free forever) and that the CMS is easy to use and SIMPLE.

      Is Storyblok better than NetlifyCMS? Or should I try Contentful?

      See more
      Jan Vlnas
      Developer Advocate at Superface · | 4 upvotes · 43.6K views

      Depends on what options and technologies you have available, and how do you deploy your website.

      There are CMSs which update existing static pages through FTP: You provide access credentials, mark editable parts of your HTML in a markup, and then edit the content through the hosted CMS. I know two systems which work like that: Cushy CMS and Surreal CMS.

      If the source of your site is versioned through Git (and hosted on GitHub), you have other options, like Netlify CMS, Spinal CMS, Siteleaf, Forestry, or CloudCannon. Some of these also need you to use static site generator (like 11ty, Jekyll, or Hugo).

      If you have some server-side scripting support available (typically PHP) you can also consider some flat-file based, server-side systems, like Kirby CMS or Lektor, which are usually simpler to retrofit into an existing template than “traditional” CMSs (WordPress, Drupal).

      Finally, you could also use a desktop-based static site generator which provides a user-friendly GUI, and then locally generates and uploads the website. For example Publii, YouDoCMS, Agit CMS.

      See more
      Ghost logo

      Ghost

      504
      499
      219
      Just a blogging platform
      504
      499
      + 1
      219
      PROS OF GHOST
      • 45
        Beautiful
      • 35
        Fast
      • 29
        Quick/simple post styling
      • 20
        Live Post Preview
      • 20
        Open source
      • 19
        Non-profit
      • 16
        Seamless writing
      • 6
        Node.js
      • 5
        Fast and Performatic
      • 5
        Javascript
      • 4
        Simplest
      • 3
        Wonderful UI
      • 3
        Handlebars
      • 3
        Full Control
      • 2
        Magic
      • 2
        Clean
      • 1
        Headless CMS
      • 1
        Self-hostable
      CONS OF GHOST
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Ghost posts