Alternatives to Redux Form logo

Alternatives to Redux Form

React, Formik, React Hook Form, jQuery, and AngularJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Redux Form.
63
92
+ 1
0

What is Redux Form and what are its top alternatives?

Redux Form is a popular library for managing form state in React applications. It allows for easy integration of complex form validation, submission handling, and form data normalization. However, Redux Form can be complex to set up and maintain, leading to potential performance issues in large applications.

  1. Formik: Formik is a widely used alternative to Redux Form that simplifies form management in React applications. It provides an intuitive API for handling form state, validation, and submission, making it easier to work with forms in React. Pros: Simplicity, flexible API. Cons: Lack of built-in support for Redux integration.
  2. React Hook Form: React Hook Form is a lightweight and performant alternative to Redux Form that utilizes React hooks for managing form state. It offers built-in validation and error handling features, making it ideal for creating efficient forms in React. Pros: Performance, ease of use. Cons: Less community support compared to Redux Form.
  3. Final Form: Final Form is a robust form library that focuses on performance and scalability. It offers a rich set of features for managing complex form state, including support for asynchronous validation and field dependencies. Pros: Performance optimization, extensive feature set. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Redux Form.
  4. React Redux Form: React Redux Form is a library that integrates Redux and Redux Form to provide a seamless form management solution for React applications. It offers easy integration with existing Redux stores and actions, making it a powerful tool for managing form state. Pros: Redux integration, compatibility with Redux DevTools. Cons: Requires familiarity with Redux concepts.
  5. Unform: Unform is a declarative form library for React applications that focuses on simplicity and reusability. It offers a clean API for defining form fields and validation rules, making it easy to create forms with minimal boilerplate code. Pros: Simplified API, reusability. Cons: Limited support for complex form scenarios.
  6. React Form: React Form is a lightweight form library for React applications that emphasizes simplicity and performance. It offers a declarative API for managing form state with React hooks, making it easy to build efficient forms in React. Pros: Lightweight, performance optimization. Cons: Limited feature set compared to Redux Form.
  7. FormState: FormState is a library that focuses on type-safety and easy integration with TypeScript in React applications. It offers robust form validation features and a simple API for managing form state with TypeScript support, making it a great choice for projects using TypeScript. Pros: TypeScript integration, type safety. Cons: Limited documentation compared to Redux Form.
  8. React Final Form: React Final Form is an alternative to Redux Form that focuses on simplicity and flexibility. It offers a clean API for managing form state with built-in validation and error handling features, making it easy to create forms in React. Pros: Simplicity, flexibility. Cons: Smaller community compared to Redux Form.
  9. Redux Form Hooks: Redux Form Hooks is a library that provides a hook-based API for working with Redux Form in React applications. It offers a more flexible and concise way to manage form state using Redux Form, making it easier to work with forms in React. Pros: Hook-based API, Redux Form integration. Cons: Limited documentation compared to Redux Form.
  10. Formily: Formily is a powerful form library that focuses on performance and scalability in React applications. It offers advanced features for managing complex form state, including support for schema-based form configuration and dynamic form rendering. Pros: Performance optimization, schema-based configuration. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Redux Form.

Top Alternatives to Redux Form

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • Formik
    Formik

    It takes care of the repetitive and annoying stuff--keeping track of values/errors/visited fields, orchestrating validation, and handling submission--so you don't have to. ...

  • React Hook Form
    React Hook Form

    Performant, flexible and extensible forms with easy to use validation.

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Vue.js
    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • jQuery UI
    jQuery UI

    Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice. ...

  • Select2
    Select2

    It gives you a customizable select box with support for searching, tagging, remote data sets, infinite scrolling, and many other highly used options. It comes with support for RTL environments, searching with diacritics and over 40 languages built-in. ...

Redux Form alternatives & related posts

React logo

React

167.8K
138.9K
4.1K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
167.8K
138.9K
+ 1
4.1K
PROS OF REACT
  • 830
    Components
  • 672
    Virtual dom
  • 578
    Performance
  • 507
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
  • 186
    Data flow
  • 166
    Declarative
  • 128
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 120
    Reactive updates
  • 115
    Explicit app state
  • 50
    JSX
  • 29
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 22
    Easy to Use
  • 21
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 17
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 11
    Great perfomance
  • 10
    Javascript
  • 9
    Built by Facebook
  • 8
    TypeScript support
  • 6
    Speed
  • 6
    Server Side Rendering
  • 5
    Feels like the 90s
  • 5
    Excellent Documentation
  • 5
    Props
  • 5
    Functional
  • 5
    Easy as Lego
  • 5
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Easy to start
  • 5
    Hooks
  • 5
    Awesome
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 4
    Super easy
  • 4
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 4
    Server side views
  • 4
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 4
    Start simple
  • 4
    Strong Community
  • 4
    Fancy third party tools
  • 4
    Scales super well
  • 3
    Has arrow functions
  • 3
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 3
    Just the View of MVC
  • 3
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 3
    Fast evolving
  • 3
    SSR
  • 3
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 3
    Rich ecosystem
  • 3
    Simple
  • 3
    Has functional components
  • 3
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 3
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 2
    Recharts
  • 2
    Permissively-licensed
  • 2
    Fragments
  • 2
    Sharable
  • 2
    Image upload
  • 2
    HTML-like
  • 1
    React hooks
  • 1
    Datatables
CONS OF REACT
  • 40
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 29
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 28
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 6
    One-way binding only
  • 3
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 3
    Bad Documentation
  • 2
    Error boundary is needed
  • 2
    Paradigms change too fast

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 3.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 30 upvotes · 3.3M views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
Formik logo

Formik

386
203
0
Build forms in React
386
203
+ 1
0
PROS OF FORMIK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF FORMIK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Formik posts

      React Hook Form logo

      React Hook Form

      95
      67
      0
      Performant, flexible and extensible forms with easy-to-use validation.
      95
      67
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF REACT HOOK FORM
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF REACT HOOK FORM
          Be the first to leave a con

          related React Hook Form posts

          Shared insights
          on
          React Hook FormReact Hook FormRedux FormRedux Form

          How do you migrate from using the Redux Form to React Hook Form

          See more
          jQuery logo

          jQuery

          189.9K
          66.6K
          6.6K
          The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
          189.9K
          66.6K
          + 1
          6.6K
          PROS OF JQUERY
          • 1.3K
            Cross-browser
          • 957
            Dom manipulation
          • 809
            Power
          • 660
            Open source
          • 610
            Plugins
          • 459
            Easy
          • 395
            Popular
          • 350
            Feature-rich
          • 281
            Html5
          • 227
            Light weight
          • 93
            Simple
          • 84
            Great community
          • 79
            CSS3 Compliant
          • 69
            Mobile friendly
          • 67
            Fast
          • 43
            Intuitive
          • 42
            Swiss Army knife for webdev
          • 35
            Huge Community
          • 11
            Easy to learn
          • 4
            Clean code
          • 3
            Because of Ajax request :)
          • 2
            Powerful
          • 2
            Nice
          • 2
            Just awesome
          • 2
            Used everywhere
          • 1
            Improves productivity
          • 1
            Javascript
          • 1
            Easy Setup
          • 1
            Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
          • 1
            It Just Works
          • 1
            Industry acceptance
          • 1
            Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
          • 1
            Widely Used
          • 1
            I love jQuery
          CONS OF JQUERY
          • 6
            Large size
          • 5
            Sometimes inconsistent API
          • 5
            Encourages DOM as primary data source
          • 2
            Live events is overly complex feature

          related jQuery posts

          Kir Shatrov
          Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

          The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

          Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

          #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

          See more
          Ganesa Vijayakumar
          Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.5M views

          I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

          I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

          As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

          UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

          Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

          Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

          Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

          Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

          Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

          Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

          Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

          Thanks, Ganesa

          See more
          AngularJS logo

          AngularJS

          60.2K
          43.3K
          5.3K
          Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
          60.2K
          43.3K
          + 1
          5.3K
          PROS OF ANGULARJS
          • 889
            Quick to develop
          • 589
            Great mvc
          • 573
            Powerful
          • 520
            Restful
          • 505
            Backed by google
          • 349
            Two-way data binding
          • 343
            Javascript
          • 329
            Open source
          • 307
            Dependency injection
          • 197
            Readable
          • 75
            Fast
          • 65
            Directives
          • 63
            Great community
          • 57
            Free
          • 38
            Extend html vocabulary
          • 29
            Components
          • 26
            Easy to test
          • 25
            Easy to learn
          • 24
            Easy to templates
          • 23
            Great documentation
          • 21
            Easy to start
          • 19
            Awesome
          • 18
            Light weight
          • 15
            Angular 2.0
          • 14
            Efficient
          • 14
            Javascript mvw framework
          • 14
            Great extensions
          • 11
            Easy to prototype with
          • 9
            High performance
          • 9
            Coffeescript
          • 8
            Two-way binding
          • 8
            Lots of community modules
          • 8
            Mvc
          • 7
            Easy to e2e
          • 7
            Clean and keeps code readable
          • 6
            One of the best frameworks
          • 6
            Easy for small applications
          • 5
            Works great with jquery
          • 5
            Fast development
          • 4
            I do not touch DOM
          • 4
            The two-way Data Binding is awesome
          • 3
            Hierarchical Data Structure
          • 3
            Be a developer, not a plumber.
          • 3
            Declarative programming
          • 3
            Typescript
          • 3
            Dart
          • 3
            Community
          • 2
            Fkin awesome
          • 2
            Opinionated in the right areas
          • 2
            Supports api , easy development
          • 2
            Common Place
          • 2
            Very very useful and fast framework for development
          • 2
            Linear learning curve
          • 2
            Great
          • 2
            Amazing community support
          • 2
            Readable code
          • 2
            Programming fun again
          • 2
            The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
          • 2
            Scopes
          • 2
            Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
          • 1
            Fk react, all my homies hate react
          CONS OF ANGULARJS
          • 12
            Complex
          • 3
            Event Listener Overload
          • 3
            Dependency injection
          • 2
            Hard to learn
          • 2
            Learning Curve

          related AngularJS posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 23 upvotes · 4.7M views

          Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

          • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
          • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
          • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
          • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
          • Jest as testing framework
          • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
          • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

          The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

          • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
          • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
          • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
          • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
          • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
          • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
          See more
          Vue.js logo

          Vue.js

          53.2K
          43.2K
          1.6K
          A progressive framework for building user interfaces
          53.2K
          43.2K
          + 1
          1.6K
          PROS OF VUE.JS
          • 293
            Simple and easy to start with
          • 229
            Good documentation
          • 196
            Components
          • 131
            Simple the best
          • 100
            Simplified AngularJS
          • 94
            Reactive
          • 77
            Intuitive APIs
          • 56
            Javascript
          • 52
            Changed my front end coding life
          • 48
            Configuration is smooth
          • 37
            Easy to learn
          • 35
            So much fun to use
          • 25
            Progressive
          • 22
            Virtual dom
          • 16
            Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
          • 12
            Component is template, javascript and style in one
          • 12
            It's magic
          • 10
            Perfomance
          • 10
            Light Weight
          • 9
            Best of Both Worlds
          • 8
            Intuitive and easy to use
          • 8
            Elegant design
          • 8
            Application structure
          • 8
            Without misleading licenses
          • 6
            Small learning curve
          • 6
            Good command line interface
          • 5
            Logicless templates
          • 5
            Like Angular only quicker to get started with
          • 5
            Single file components
          • 5
            Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
          • 4
            High performance
          • 3
            Vuex
          • 3
            Component based
          • 3
            Customer Render ending eg to HTML
          • 3
            Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
          • 2
            Concise error messages
          • 2
            Supports several template languages
          • 2
            One-way data flow
          • 2
            Lots of documentation
          • 2
            Intuitive
          • 1
            GUI
          CONS OF VUE.JS
          • 9
            Less Common Place
          • 5
            YXMLvsHTML Markup
          • 3
            Don't support fragments
          • 3
            Only support programatically multiple root nodes

          related Vue.js posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 4.7M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Johnny Bell
          Shared insights
          on
          Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

          I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

          It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

          See more
          jQuery UI logo

          jQuery UI

          40.2K
          13K
          899
          Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
          40.2K
          13K
          + 1
          899
          PROS OF JQUERY UI
          • 215
            Ui components
          • 156
            Cross-browser
          • 121
            Easy
          • 100
            It's jquery
          • 81
            Open source
          • 57
            Widgets
          • 48
            Plugins
          • 46
            Popular
          • 39
            Datepicker
          • 23
            Great community
          • 7
            DOM Manipulation
          • 6
            Themes
          • 0
            Some good ui components
          CONS OF JQUERY UI
          • 1
            Does not contain charts or graphs

          related jQuery UI posts

          Ganesa Vijayakumar
          Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.5M views

          I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

          I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

          As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

          UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

          Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

          Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

          Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

          Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

          Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

          Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

          Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

          Thanks, Ganesa

          See more
          Khauth György
          CTO at SalesAutopilot Kft. · | 12 upvotes · 549.6K views

          I'm the CTO of a marketing automation SaaS. Because of the continuously increasing load we moved to the AWSCloud. We are using more and more features of AWS: Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon SNS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53 and so on.

          Our main Database is MySQL but for the hundreds of GB document data we use MongoDB more and more. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.

          On the front-end we use jQuery UI + Smarty but now we refactor our app to use Vue.js with Vuetify. Because our app is relatively complex we need to use vuex as well.

          On the development side we use GitHub as our main repo, Docker for local and server environment and Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline for Continuous Integration.

          See more
          Select2 logo

          Select2

          3K
          71
          0
          The jQuery replacement for select boxes
          3K
          71
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF SELECT2
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF SELECT2
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Select2 posts