Alternatives to OrientDB logo

Alternatives to OrientDB

Neo4j, MongoDB, ArangoDB, PostgreSQL, and JanusGraph are the most popular alternatives and competitors to OrientDB.
62
96
+ 1
14

What is OrientDB and what are its top alternatives?

It is an open source NoSQL database management system written in Java. It is a Multi-model database, supporting graph, document, key/value, and object models, but the relationships are managed as in graph databases with direct connections between records.
OrientDB is a tool in the Databases category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to OrientDB

  • Neo4j
    Neo4j

    Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions. ...

  • MongoDB
    MongoDB

    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding. ...

  • ArangoDB
    ArangoDB

    A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions. ...

  • PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL

    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions. ...

  • JanusGraph
    JanusGraph

    It is a scalable graph database optimized for storing and querying graphs containing hundreds of billions of vertices and edges distributed across a multi-machine cluster. It is a transactional database that can support thousands of concurrent users executing complex graph traversals in real time. ...

  • Dgraph
    Dgraph

    Dgraph's goal is to provide Google production level scale and throughput, with low enough latency to be serving real time user queries, over terabytes of structured data. Dgraph supports GraphQL-like query syntax, and responds in JSON and Protocol Buffers over GRPC and HTTP. ...

  • MySQL
    MySQL

    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software. ...

  • Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft SQL Server

    Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions. ...

OrientDB alternatives & related posts

Neo4j logo

Neo4j

1.1K
1.3K
353
The world’s leading Graph Database
1.1K
1.3K
+ 1
353
PROS OF NEO4J
  • 70
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
  • 24
    ACID
  • 21
    Easy setup
  • 17
    Great support
  • 11
    Clustering
  • 9
    Hot Backups
  • 8
    Great Web Admin UI
  • 7
    Mature
  • 7
    Powerful, flexible data model
  • 6
    Embeddable
  • 5
    Easy to Use and Model
  • 4
    Best Graphdb
  • 4
    Highly-available
  • 2
    Great onboarding process
  • 2
    It's awesome, I wanted to try it
  • 2
    Used by Crunchbase
  • 2
    Great query language and built in data browser
CONS OF NEO4J
  • 5
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost

related Neo4j posts

We have an in-house build experiment management system. We produce samples as input to the next step, which then could produce 1 sample(1-1) and many samples (1 - many). There are many steps like this. So far, we are tracking genealogy (limited tracking) in the MySQL database, which is becoming hard to trace back to the original material or sample(I can give more details if required). So, we are considering a Graph database. I am requesting advice from the experts.

  1. Is a graph database the right choice, or can we manage with RDBMS?
  2. If RDBMS, which RDMS, which feature, or which approach could make this manageable or sustainable
  3. If Graph database(Neo4j, OrientDB, Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon Neptune, ArangoDB), which one is good, and what are the best practices?

I am sorry that this might be a loaded question.

See more

I'm evaluating the use of RedisGraph vs Microsoft SQL Server 2019 graph features to build a social graph. One of the key criteria is high availability and cross data center replication of data. While Neo4j is a much-matured solution in general, I'm not accounting for it due to the cost & introduction of a new stack in the ecosystem. Also, due to the nature of data & org policies, using a cloud-based solution won't be a viable choice.

We currently use Redis as a cache & SQL server 2019 as RDBMS.

I'm inclining towards SQL server 2019 graph as we already use SQL server extensively as relational database & have all the HA and cross data center replication setup readily available. I still need to evaluate if it fulfills our need as a graph DB though, I also learned that SQL server 2019 is still a new player in the market and attempts to fit a graph-like query on top of a relational model (with node and edge tables). RedisGraph seems very promising. However, I'm not totally sure about HA, Graph data backup, cross-data center support.

See more
MongoDB logo

MongoDB

78.3K
66.6K
4.1K
The database for giant ideas
78.3K
66.6K
+ 1
4.1K
PROS OF MONGODB
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 592
    No sql
  • 552
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 409
    High performance
  • 257
    Free
  • 217
    Open source
  • 180
    Flexible
  • 144
    Replication & high availability
  • 112
    Easy to maintain
  • 42
    Querying
  • 39
    Easy scalability
  • 38
    Auto-sharding
  • 37
    High availability
  • 31
    Map/reduce
  • 27
    Document database
  • 25
    Full index support
  • 25
    Easy setup
  • 16
    Reliable
  • 15
    Fast in-place updates
  • 14
    Agile programming, flexible, fast
  • 12
    No database migrations
  • 8
    Enterprise
  • 8
    Easy integration with Node.Js
  • 6
    Enterprise Support
  • 5
    Great NoSQL DB
  • 4
    Support for many languages through different drivers
  • 3
    Drivers support is good
  • 3
    Aggregation Framework
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Easy to Scale
  • 2
    Awesome
  • 2
    Schemaless
  • 2
    Managed service
  • 1
    Consistent
  • 1
    Acid Compliant
CONS OF MONGODB
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 1
    Proprietary query language

related MongoDB posts

Jeyabalaji Subramanian

Recently we were looking at a few robust and cost-effective ways of replicating the data that resides in our production MongoDB to a PostgreSQL database for data warehousing and business intelligence.

We set ourselves the following criteria for the optimal tool that would do this job: - The data replication must be near real-time, yet it should NOT impact the production database - The data replication must be horizontally scalable (based on the load), asynchronous & crash-resilient

Based on the above criteria, we selected the following tools to perform the end to end data replication:

We chose MongoDB Stitch for picking up the changes in the source database. It is the serverless platform from MongoDB. One of the services offered by MongoDB Stitch is Stitch Triggers. Using stitch triggers, you can execute a serverless function (in Node.js) in real time in response to changes in the database. When there are a lot of database changes, Stitch automatically "feeds forward" these changes through an asynchronous queue.

We chose Amazon SQS as the pipe / message backbone for communicating the changes from MongoDB to our own replication service. Interestingly enough, MongoDB stitch offers integration with AWS services.

In the Node.js function, we wrote minimal functionality to communicate the database changes (insert / update / delete / replace) to Amazon SQS.

Next we wrote a minimal micro-service in Python to listen to the message events on SQS, pickup the data payload & mirror the DB changes on to the target Data warehouse. We implemented source data to target data translation by modelling target table structures through SQLAlchemy . We deployed this micro-service as AWS Lambda with Zappa. With Zappa, deploying your services as event-driven & horizontally scalable Lambda service is dumb-easy.

In the end, we got to implement a highly scalable near realtime Change Data Replication service that "works" and deployed to production in a matter of few days!

See more
Robert Zuber

We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

See more
ArangoDB logo

ArangoDB

251
401
188
A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.
251
401
+ 1
188
PROS OF ARANGODB
  • 35
    Grahps and documents in one DB
  • 26
    Intuitive and rich query language
  • 25
    Open source
  • 24
    Good documentation
  • 20
    Joins for collections
  • 15
    Foxx is great platform
  • 14
    Great out of the box web interface with API playground
  • 6
    Good driver support
  • 6
    Low maintenance efforts
  • 6
    Clustering
  • 5
    Easy microservice creation with foxx
  • 4
    You can write true backendless apps
  • 2
    Managed solution available
  • 0
    Performance
CONS OF ARANGODB
  • 3
    Web ui has still room for improvement
  • 2
    No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL

related ArangoDB posts

We have an in-house build experiment management system. We produce samples as input to the next step, which then could produce 1 sample(1-1) and many samples (1 - many). There are many steps like this. So far, we are tracking genealogy (limited tracking) in the MySQL database, which is becoming hard to trace back to the original material or sample(I can give more details if required). So, we are considering a Graph database. I am requesting advice from the experts.

  1. Is a graph database the right choice, or can we manage with RDBMS?
  2. If RDBMS, which RDMS, which feature, or which approach could make this manageable or sustainable
  3. If Graph database(Neo4j, OrientDB, Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon Neptune, ArangoDB), which one is good, and what are the best practices?

I am sorry that this might be a loaded question.

See more

Hello All, I'm building an app that will enable users to create documents using ckeditor or TinyMCE editor. The data is then stored in a database and retrieved to display to the user, these docs can contain image data also. The number of pages generated for a single document can go up to 1000. Therefore by design, each page is stored in a separate JSON. I'm wondering which database is the right one to choose between ArangoDB and PostgreSQL. Your thoughts, advice please. Thanks, Kashyap

See more
PostgreSQL logo

PostgreSQL

81.3K
66K
3.5K
A powerful, open source object-relational database system
81.3K
66K
+ 1
3.5K
PROS OF POSTGRESQL
  • 754
    Relational database
  • 508
    High availability
  • 435
    Enterprise class database
  • 379
    Sql
  • 303
    Sql + nosql
  • 171
    Great community
  • 145
    Easy to setup
  • 130
    Heroku
  • 128
    Secure by default
  • 112
    Postgis
  • 48
    Supports Key-Value
  • 46
    Great JSON support
  • 32
    Cross platform
  • 30
    Extensible
  • 26
    Replication
  • 24
    Triggers
  • 22
    Rollback
  • 21
    Multiversion concurrency control
  • 20
    Open source
  • 17
    Heroku Add-on
  • 14
    Stable, Simple and Good Performance
  • 13
    Powerful
  • 12
    Lets be serious, what other SQL DB would you go for?
  • 9
    Good documentation
  • 7
    Scalable
  • 7
    Intelligent optimizer
  • 6
    Reliable
  • 6
    Transactional DDL
  • 6
    Modern
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    One stop solution for all things sql no matter the os
  • 4
    Relational database with MVCC
  • 3
    Faster Development
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 3
    Developer friendly
  • 2
    Excellent source code
  • 2
    search
  • 2
    Great DB for Transactional system or Application
  • 1
    Full-text
  • 1
    Free version
  • 1
    Open-source
  • 1
    Text
CONS OF POSTGRESQL
  • 9
    Table/index bloatings

related PostgreSQL posts

Jeyabalaji Subramanian

Recently we were looking at a few robust and cost-effective ways of replicating the data that resides in our production MongoDB to a PostgreSQL database for data warehousing and business intelligence.

We set ourselves the following criteria for the optimal tool that would do this job: - The data replication must be near real-time, yet it should NOT impact the production database - The data replication must be horizontally scalable (based on the load), asynchronous & crash-resilient

Based on the above criteria, we selected the following tools to perform the end to end data replication:

We chose MongoDB Stitch for picking up the changes in the source database. It is the serverless platform from MongoDB. One of the services offered by MongoDB Stitch is Stitch Triggers. Using stitch triggers, you can execute a serverless function (in Node.js) in real time in response to changes in the database. When there are a lot of database changes, Stitch automatically "feeds forward" these changes through an asynchronous queue.

We chose Amazon SQS as the pipe / message backbone for communicating the changes from MongoDB to our own replication service. Interestingly enough, MongoDB stitch offers integration with AWS services.

In the Node.js function, we wrote minimal functionality to communicate the database changes (insert / update / delete / replace) to Amazon SQS.

Next we wrote a minimal micro-service in Python to listen to the message events on SQS, pickup the data payload & mirror the DB changes on to the target Data warehouse. We implemented source data to target data translation by modelling target table structures through SQLAlchemy . We deployed this micro-service as AWS Lambda with Zappa. With Zappa, deploying your services as event-driven & horizontally scalable Lambda service is dumb-easy.

In the end, we got to implement a highly scalable near realtime Change Data Replication service that "works" and deployed to production in a matter of few days!

See more
Tim Abbott

We've been using PostgreSQL since the very early days of Zulip, but we actually didn't use it from the beginning. Zulip started out as a MySQL project back in 2012, because we'd heard it was a good choice for a startup with a wide community. However, we found that even though we were using the Django ORM for most of our database access, we spent a lot of time fighting with MySQL. Issues ranged from bad collation defaults, to bad query plans which required a lot of manual query tweaks.

We ended up getting so frustrated that we tried out PostgresQL, and the results were fantastic. We didn't have to do any real customization (just some tuning settings for how big a server we had), and all of our most important queries were faster out of the box. As a result, we were able to delete a bunch of custom queries escaping the ORM that we'd written to make the MySQL query planner happy (because postgres just did the right thing automatically).

And then after that, we've just gotten a ton of value out of postgres. We use its excellent built-in full-text search, which has helped us avoid needing to bring in a tool like Elasticsearch, and we've really enjoyed features like its partial indexes, which saved us a lot of work adding unnecessary extra tables to get good performance for things like our "unread messages" and "starred messages" indexes.

I can't recommend it highly enough.

See more
JanusGraph logo

JanusGraph

37
81
0
Open-source, distributed graph database
37
81
+ 1
0
PROS OF JANUSGRAPH
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JANUSGRAPH
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JanusGraph posts

      Dgraph logo

      Dgraph

      117
      198
      9
      Fast, Distributed Graph DB
      117
      198
      + 1
      9
      PROS OF DGRAPH
      • 3
        Graphql as a query language is nice if you like apollo
      • 2
        Easy set up
      • 2
        Low learning curve
      • 1
        Open Source
      • 1
        High Performance
      CONS OF DGRAPH
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Dgraph posts

        MySQL logo

        MySQL

        103.6K
        85.9K
        3.7K
        The world's most popular open source database
        103.6K
        85.9K
        + 1
        3.7K
        PROS OF MYSQL
        • 796
          Sql
        • 675
          Free
        • 557
          Easy
        • 527
          Widely used
        • 487
          Open source
        • 180
          High availability
        • 160
          Cross-platform support
        • 104
          Great community
        • 78
          Secure
        • 75
          Full-text indexing and searching
        • 25
          Fast, open, available
        • 15
          SSL support
        • 14
          Reliable
        • 13
          Robust
        • 8
          Enterprise Version
        • 7
          Easy to set up on all platforms
        • 2
          NoSQL access to JSON data type
        • 1
          Relational database
        • 1
          Easy, light, scalable
        • 1
          Sequel Pro (best SQL GUI)
        • 1
          Replica Support
        CONS OF MYSQL
        • 15
          Owned by a company with their own agenda
        • 2
          Can't roll back schema changes

        related MySQL posts

        Tim Abbott

        We've been using PostgreSQL since the very early days of Zulip, but we actually didn't use it from the beginning. Zulip started out as a MySQL project back in 2012, because we'd heard it was a good choice for a startup with a wide community. However, we found that even though we were using the Django ORM for most of our database access, we spent a lot of time fighting with MySQL. Issues ranged from bad collation defaults, to bad query plans which required a lot of manual query tweaks.

        We ended up getting so frustrated that we tried out PostgresQL, and the results were fantastic. We didn't have to do any real customization (just some tuning settings for how big a server we had), and all of our most important queries were faster out of the box. As a result, we were able to delete a bunch of custom queries escaping the ORM that we'd written to make the MySQL query planner happy (because postgres just did the right thing automatically).

        And then after that, we've just gotten a ton of value out of postgres. We use its excellent built-in full-text search, which has helped us avoid needing to bring in a tool like Elasticsearch, and we've really enjoyed features like its partial indexes, which saved us a lot of work adding unnecessary extra tables to get good performance for things like our "unread messages" and "starred messages" indexes.

        I can't recommend it highly enough.

        See more
        Conor Myhrvold
        Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 22 upvotes · 1.3M views

        Our most popular (& controversial!) article to date on the Uber Engineering blog in 3+ yrs. Why we moved from PostgreSQL to MySQL. In essence, it was due to a variety of limitations of Postgres at the time. Fun fact -- earlier in Uber's history we'd actually moved from MySQL to Postgres before switching back for good, & though we published the article in Summer 2016 we haven't looked back since:

        The early architecture of Uber consisted of a monolithic backend application written in Python that used Postgres for data persistence. Since that time, the architecture of Uber has changed significantly, to a model of microservices and new data platforms. Specifically, in many of the cases where we previously used Postgres, we now use Schemaless, a novel database sharding layer built on top of MySQL (https://eng.uber.com/schemaless-part-one/). In this article, we’ll explore some of the drawbacks we found with Postgres and explain the decision to build Schemaless and other backend services on top of MySQL:

        https://eng.uber.com/mysql-migration/

        See more
        Microsoft SQL Server logo

        Microsoft SQL Server

        16.7K
        12.3K
        539
        A relational database management system developed by Microsoft
        16.7K
        12.3K
        + 1
        539
        PROS OF MICROSOFT SQL SERVER
        • 139
          Reliable and easy to use
        • 102
          High performance
        • 95
          Great with .net
        • 65
          Works well with .net
        • 56
          Easy to maintain
        • 21
          Azure support
        • 17
          Always on
        • 17
          Full Index Support
        • 10
          Enterprise manager is fantastic
        • 9
          In-Memory OLTP Engine
        • 2
          Security is forefront
        • 1
          Columnstore indexes
        • 1
          Great documentation
        • 1
          Faster Than Oracle
        • 1
          Decent management tools
        • 1
          Easy to setup and configure
        • 1
          Docker Delivery
        CONS OF MICROSOFT SQL SERVER
        • 4
          Expensive Licensing
        • 2
          Microsoft

        related Microsoft SQL Server posts

        We initially started out with Heroku as our PaaS provider due to a desire to use it by our original developer for our Ruby on Rails application/website at the time. We were finding response times slow, it was painfully slow, sometimes taking 10 seconds to start loading the main page. Moving up to the next "compute" level was going to be very expensive.

        We moved our site over to AWS Elastic Beanstalk , not only did response times on the site practically become instant, our cloud bill for the application was cut in half.

        In database world we are currently using Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL also, we have both MariaDB and Microsoft SQL Server both hosted on Amazon RDS. The plan is to migrate to AWS Aurora Serverless for all 3 of those database systems.

        Additional services we use for our public applications: AWS Lambda, Python, Redis, Memcached, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon Elasticsearch Service, Amazon ElastiCache

        See more

        I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

        1. I need to use either MySQL or PostgreSQL on a Linux based OS. Which would be better for this application?
        2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
        See more